Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@davidmilne5833 says : Typical we can’t do from Tim Buckley. This type of negative attitude is why Australia has gone backwards.>> <<@ko5000 says : My patients work in ANSTO, which is a nuclear plant....so Australia does have nuclear reactor.>> <<@TEWITHSG says : "When we look at the politics of this it seems to be all or nothing, nuclear vs renewables". Nuclear only became political when Peter Dutton proposed it. Peter Dutton throws policy shit into a fan, looks to see where it lands but always know that Sky News and News Corp will lick it up and say its brave Australian made, small government chocolate.>> <<@AmandaHudson-m4r says : What a fool 😂>> <<@Christoph1888 says : "Climate energy finance" is renewable energy advocacy group.>> <<@Christoph1888 says : "Long touted plan" isnt this only a few months old>> <<@imeagleeye1 says : Let Alone not being able to treat or safely Dispose of the used Uranium. This highly toxic and dangerous Radioactive Waste is not only untreatable in never goes away a true forever problem.>> <<@dixonpinfold2582 says : Who's paying Tim Buckley for that empty spin? Ontario hasn't built reactors since 1988 not because they're not working out, but because _they are indeed doing their job very well._ And the technology has been kept fully up to date with constant modernization and refurbishment. The electricity price (US$0.10/kWh) speaks for itself.>> <<@edwardbec9844 says : Let see which is Financial Ineptitude .. Spending Several Trillions every 10 -15 Years on the Name says it all "Renewables" so guess who the Cash Cows Are , The Australian Taxpayers .. where is the Return on the Investment Energy Security and Continuity of Supply? the So Called Cheaper Energy Costs? who is this guy another Bowen from Labors Socialist left Think Tank Trotting out to Read from The Anti Nuclear Script .. why is it The UAE from a cold start became a Nuclear energy Producer in 12 Years Concurrently Built 4 APR 1400 Reactors on time on Budget Last Reactor came online March 2024 .. the Nuclear Power systems are a Long term Investment in the Future of Australia .. Self Reliant Power Generation whereas The Like Of This guy and Albanese various Australian Billionaires have Sold out Australia Making Us more Dependent Upon China's Supply and Conditions like the 14 Point Plan to Normalize the Relationship btw China is Building Nuclear and Coal Fired Power Stations they are Not going to Bow to Paris Agreement nor the 2050 or 2060>> <<@Timbotao says : Nobody talks about nuclear waste?>>>> add that to the equation, not just the construction of new plants....where DOES the waste from these plants go?? there is NO permanent facilities ANY WHERE in the World yet, Onkalo in Finland is almost online soon... but shipping all the way to Europe for all of our waste?.. we are already wasting $Millions of dollars re-processing the nuclear waste we already have in the UK at Sellafield, and in France... it costs us Millions of dollars just to ship it there and get it then very expensively reprocessed (into storage containers for high level waste in a vitrified form) and then it gets sent back to us.... then they sit in temporary nuclear waste dumps, mostly now at ANSTO in the south of sydney (35klms from the 2nd largest population base in Aus!!?!! lol)... where they are not officially authorised to store so much waste... but we don't have a permanent nuclear waste site yet either... and the Govts have already spent about $24million dollars just doing search and survey to try to find a suitable waste site in Aus, but as yet after all that spending... they have not found or established a permanent nuclear waste dump yet. Also the Sellafield Nuclear site and reprocessing plant in the UK (that we have used) is now decommissioning (as at july 2022) so we can't use them to even re-process our high level nuclear waste into 'safe' storage methods... the UK Govt is spending: "The clean-up and decommissioning of the Sellafield Nuclear Licensed Site is currently estimated by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority to cost between £60 – 140 billion over a 120-year period." That is $114 - $266 BILLION!! Australian dollars to clean up the site of their re-processing site... OVER the next 120 years... LOL... Dutton needs to add clean up and permanent nuclear waste storage into his costings... THE 7 NUCLEAR PLANTS COSTS WILL BE ASTRONOMICAL if they actually did all the accounting properly....>> <<@lloydsingline340 says : Bullshit.>> <<@kevincrouch3956 says : Finally some balanced sensible fact based reporting on Sky...she better watch out- she'll be sacked>> <<@markpurnell7881 says : Has anyone ever heard of a Thorium Reactor. Despite the propaganda on the internet. Australia has an abundance of it. It's cheaper, safer, and CANNOT be used to make Nuclear weapons. It can even burn of the waste created by Nuclear reactors, and we don't use it.???? Thorium number 90 on the periodic table.>> <<@markpurnell7881 says : Dear Tim Buckley. Thank you very much on the lecture, without you even realising it, you just explained to the whole of Australia how the Government manipulates figures to make them say whatever they want. You brainless bloody zero, now everyone knows how the Government lies to us., That's sarcasm BTW.>> <<@lachlanbell8390 says : "We can't invest in a solution that will be stable & reliable over the long term, because it would take too long to meet our arbitrary self-assigned target of reducing the gas that all life is made up of" Ladies & gentlemen, I give you: the super-serious, super-realistically, completely-credible opposition to nuclear energy.>> <<@falafelscobes6122 says : But electricity from Twiggy Forest’s wind farms for 25 years? Or a state owned nuclear power plant for 50 years?>> <<@danfam-v8t says : https://ozlnp.wordpress.com/2024/06/20/negative-effects-of-living-near-nuclear-power-plants-health-environmental-and-psychological-risks/>> <<@PeterKhan-s2g says : How come then Lucas heights built a nuclear reactor in 9 years and why not ask them how much they paid for the reactor>> <<@PeterKhan-s2g says : This bloke needs to wake up>> <<@Wandjina104 says : Peter Dutton knows that nuclear is the most expensive option. He knows that implementation will take 16+ years. He also knows that private capital will not touch it. This is why he says that it will be a government managed project. It will be taxpayers and users who pay the price. This is an electoral ploy. He knows it will fail but who cares as long as he gets a shot at Prime Minister.>> <<@piersculley6419 says : Okay Tim, don't we have a nuclear facility for medical purposes in Sydney? So no nuclear capacity in Australia, so why are we buying nuclear subs, by what you're saying we should scrap that idea as well.>> <<@bigearz255 says : Show me the money, Potato-head>> <<@adrianw7011 says : A Climate Energy Finance Director does what exactly? Other than cherry picking his own facts to support his own agenda to protect his own investment in the renewable scam, he offered nothing of substance to dispel nuclear as an option.>> <<@Darshyboy says : So this guy is talking about a nuke plant that was made 45 years ago... a completely different unit to the one that we are building. Good job muppet.>> <<@Darshyboy says : No one cares about financial logic to the climate cult>> <<@Didigetitwrong says : When do we start the debate for nuclear weapons?>> <<@Ich_slage_dich_in_dominos says : just imagine a world where they tall you ..we don't have enogh sunlight for our solar panels or wind for turbines soo yeah this is your new bill for this month or year and then every 25 years when they have to take them down during the rebuild process... your prices are going to sky roxket and nuclear you are going to have 24/7 for 80 to 100 years - and also it works all over the world why should all them have it and we don't and companies are going where there is cheap electricity and gas>> <<@Didigetitwrong says : A voice of reason.>> <<@edwardbec9844 says : Let see which is Financial Ineptitude .. Spending Several Trillions every 10 -15 Years on the Name says it all "Renewables" so guess who the Cash Cows Are , The Australian Taxpayers .. where is the Return on the Investment Energy Security and Continuity of Supply? the So Called Cheaper Energy Costs? who is this guy another Bowen from Labors Socialist left Think Tank Trotting out to Read from The Anti Nuclear Script .. why is it the The UAE from a cold start became a Nuclear energy Producer in 12 Years Concurrently Built 4 APR 1400 Reactors on time on Budget Last Reactor came online March 2024 .. the Nuclear Power systems are a Long term Investment in the Future of Australia .. Self Reliant Power Generation whereas The Like Of This guy and Albanese various Australian Billionaires have Sold out Australia Making Us more Dependent Upon China's Supply and Conditions like the 14 Point Plan to Normalize the Relationship btw China is Building Nuclear and Coal Fired Power Stations they are Not going to Bow to Paris Agreement nor the 2050 or 2060>> <<@kensommers5096 says : And i Wonder who pays Tim Buckleys paycheck? Climate energy finance director says it all 🤣🤣, and as for a trillion dollars of outside investment. Well didn't the CEO of Alinta energy say that that would be passed on to consumers? I'd rather pay for it with my taxes thanks. 🤠👍❤️🇭🇲 Go Dutton vote LNP!>> <<@zympf says : a "climate crisis" bullshit artist>> <<@zympf says : Co2 has *never* been shown to drive climate>> <<@shanewheeler713 says : They constantly go on about how expensive it is right! But modern reactors have a life of more than 100 years so amortize 3 Billion over 100 years and you get why all this talk about being to expensive is BS. 3 Billion amortized over the life of the plant is 30Milion a year. they are trying to deflect and pull the wool over your eyes.>> <<@TruthWarrior1 says : So a couple of billion solar panels and batteries to provide a buffer is somehow cheap at more than a trillion dollars and will need to be replaced at two decade and decade intervals? Nuclear is definitely cheaper than that and if these clowns pulled their finger out they could have these built in a decade.>> <<@lesleyosborne9319 says : China are Building 30 COAL POWER STATIONS IN 3 MONTHS.>> <<@lesleyosborne9319 says : So he WANTS TRILLIONS in Transmission Lines. 25yrs is Bull Shi.. its called FIX the Coal Stations. And RIP UP the Paris thing. He has Investments $$$>> <<@ray-jg1pc says : Of course it would be to the media their agenda is well known>> <<@xbgtjg66 says : why do we let the gov have any say in what powers this country , they sold the rights to that, just like the nbn funded by tax payers so the telcos can profit . firstly we have clean coal , it works and its cheap , we should ban selling that to any overseas country if its SO bad for the environment . as for the wind/solar s hitshow they know this will never work and they have wasted billions on this so far with no rewards , we all know its cheap and nasty for a reason>> <<@lesleyosborne9319 says : How is it Financially wrong. Its Better than $$ trillions oF Wind mills The CFA is REFUSING tobput OUT FIRES. Can HE HOLD A HOSE?? while Australia BURNS>> <<@CJ-xk7vs says : Thanks MR Dutton, Our next PM>> <<@Dont_Gnaw_on_the_Kitty_1 says : Duttons plan financially illogical yet the delusionals on Sky support it? Why?>> <<@morfawmforgham4883 says : Good and educative analysis 👍>> <<@deanarmbrecht3770 says : Wow! This guy is the "Climate" Energy Finance Director who has drunk the ant-nuclear cool aid and supports Chinese "clean" tech. China is willing to make us poor and enrich themselves by selling us CCP "made by coal" green tech. Also if China is installing so much solar and wind generation how much land will China cover with panels and turbines?? Probably a lot! And who paid for this CCP disciple's two week green holiday in China?? Could it possibly have been the CCP or an affliated company? Snake oil merchants and CCP net zero useful idiots would sell their grandmothers for a buck. De-risk from China or alternatively enjoy the "struggle session" after reading my post.>> <<@troywallace322 says : Why is China still buying our coal Timbo 😒>> <<@tsme7733 says : Those parasitical rent seekers heavily invested in renewables are in panic mode over Duttons proposal. Let them squirm.>> <<@steveblake6877 says : The Nuclear Power cost is less than the massive cost of on-going renewables. The wind turbines have a short life and a lot of breakdowns. Solar panels are a looming waste disaster. Batteries are absolutely filthy. Lithium is one of the worst products to produce and to dispose of. Filthy. We need Nuclear. Be it Liberal or Labor state premiers, they should have a vision for our nation, not a personal navel gazing approach.>> <<@BobHawkeREAL says : Looks like @Brains_Into_Monuments is going to be triggered and poor forever 😂 "Haych-Jays" again tonight bud?>> <<@williamzabiski7653 says : it is logical>> <<@isomorph7954 says : 20 years ago there weren't any woke fkwits, but now that's a burgeoning industry, and no one thought that possible.>> <<@Kim-q8x says : No, it's not illogical. Don't listen to the CSIRO who get paid by the government. Don't be fools.>>