<<@jennymills3147 says : Lift the moratorium and the market will decide.>> <<@Poorlineforeva says : Rubbish>> <<@rosscoe3005 says : I'ts just a play at getting elected from Dutton.. Strange how it came out of the blue at a perfect time but is not an idea they put forward before.. This is just telling people what they want to hear in order to take all the power. Why are people so dumb that they think it's anything other than a stunt to win on election day. What are the chances if he wins you will all complain and want him out within a few years? about 90% i say... Australia is ruined by the two party system which was designed to advantage themselves and take away competition that would threaten them either running the country or being next in line to do so.. The duopoly hypocrisy and you do as they say not as they do.>> <<@rosscoe3005 says : How do they get the money to build it? They don't have any money to fix housing and they keep high immigration. They have no money for average Australians but have piles of it for things like submarines, immigration, nuclear power, MP pay rises, 20% superannuation for MP's, private jets and a fully tax payer funded life on top of large salaries. Seems they have a lot of spare money for their own needs.>> <<@rosscoe3005 says : How will this help average Australians? What we will have a new way to increase cost to consumer. Tax payers will pay billions just to have the pleasure of paying for corporate profits.>> <<@desking8065 says : 1 A SMR costing This bloke just double crossed himself. What has wiring to the house got to do with solar. There is nothing to base any costings on as the US has abandoned work on an SMR because the buyers have pulled out after rising costs. [ Westinghouse] Canada will not start on a SMR until 2030 The Callide power station has run a muck for lack of maintenance and costing. 10 Years of no power additions. This plant should have shut down years ago. The operators should be castrated for letting this disaster go on for so long. @awc900 5 minutes ago Let's just remove the moratorium and get some real costings on nuclear instead of the biased guesswork from the likes of AEMO and CSIRO. There is no costings because work on the first 300 MwH reactor has been abandoned as buyers have pulled out because of rising costs. Who would buy an untested machine any way. I mean for years. @stewartbrooker 5 minutes ago $100 billion for around 11GW of Nuclear, you can get 110GW of Solar for the same cost No such thing as that 1.4 GwH is the largest reactor ever built [England]>> <<@alancotterell9207 says : Nuclear power's capital cost will only be known long after the money has been spent, and the reactors have been sold.>> <<@Gregpriestley-q4e says : Wonderful to hear from a learned leader in an industry>> <<@TheGuesty26 says : Blows me away how stupid Australia is>> <<@graemeschubert6162 says : Bullshit ๐Ÿ˜…>> <<@chrisgriffiths2533 says : Sky is a Bunch of Shockers. Still No Hard Questions about Nuclear.>> <<@terrymorey404 says : labor is stupid they are brinigin a nuclear power station into west aus because of the nuclear submarines but there's a ban on nuclear thats the kettle calling the pot black>> <<@chrisgriffiths2533 says : Is Professor Adi Paterson saying We Should Not Connect the WA Grid to the East Coast Grid.>> <<@chrisgriffiths2533 says : Leader Littleproud Must be Upfront with Regional Australians and Give the TOTAL COSTS OF COAL. INCLUDING COST OF SUBSIDIES TO THE COAL INDUSTRY. Give the Cost for Last Year, The Last Ten Years, The Last Fifty Years in Today Dollars.>> <<@Philip-hv2kc says : Thank god the LNP has bitten the bullet . Hydro 2 from the figures I've seen will be a waste of 12 billion, i think maybe ywo billion has already been sunk into 150 metres of tunnel work , i very vaguely recall some complications due to encountering granite rock but very vague on it .>> <<@Philip-hv2kc says : He says people will be able to come to Australia and populate the place . It's already populated but current state of affairs still doesn't prevent labour inviting ยฝ million immigrants per year ; but they do bring money to purchase real estate and pay top dollar for everything else and prop up the Australian economy.>> <<@GeoffMiell says : There are plenty of examples around the world to understand how much the capital costs of nuclear power generator units are and how long it takes to deploy them. Why would it be significantly different in Australia? Peter Dutton cited favourably the large-scale Westinghouse AP-1000 reactor design with 1,117 MWโ‚‘ net capacity each, used for the recently operational VOGTLE-3 unit and not yet fully operational VOGTLE-4 unit in Georgia, USA, where a recent cost estimate is AU$23.6 billion/GW. USA has demonstrated it took almost 17-years to get its VOGTLE-3 unit operational, from Southern Nuclearโ€™s formal application for an Early Site Permit in Aug 2006, to construction commencing on 2 Mar 2013 to full operations on 31 Jul 2023, and 18-years for VOGTLE-4. For the HINKLEY POINT C-1 & -2 project in the UK, for the Framatome/EDF EPR-1750 design with 1,630 MWโ‚‘ net capacity, the estimate is AU$27.2 billion/GW. UK looks like it will take at least 19-years to get the first of its twin reactors designated HINKLEY POINT C-1 &-2, from when the site was one of eight announced by the British government in 2010, to construction commencing of HINKLEY POINT C-1 on 11 Dec 2018 to the latest expected start date at least by 2029. The UAE has demonstrated it took more than 15-years to get its first nuclear reactor unit operational from scratch, from an Energy Planning Study in 2006 through to announcement of their Nuclear Policy in 2008, to construction commencing for BARAKAH-1 on 19 Jul 2012 to full operations on 1 Apr 2021, and more than 18-years for its BARAKAH-4 (yet to be fully operational) unit. According to some estimates, the all up cost for the four units (4x 1,337 MWโ‚‘ net capacity) with finance was $US34 billion, or more than $AU50 billion. Former Australian Chief Scientist Dr Alan Finkel suggests any call to go directly from coal to nuclear is effectively a call to delay decarbonisation of our electricity system by 20 years. Unlike the US and the UK, Australia has no regulatory, construction, and/or operational nuclear power experience, so I'd suggest that Australia might see the first prospective operational unit in 20 years at the earliest. On Sunday (Jun 23), on the ABC TV ๐˜๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด program Ted O'Brien MP indicated there likely would be multiple reactors at each of the nominated sites: Tarong & Callide in Queensland; Liddell & Mt Piper in NSW; Loy Yang in Victoria; Port Augusta in SA; and Muja in WA. So the total implementation costs are certainly looking in the hundreds of billions of dollars to perhaps over a trillion dollars. But the Coalition won't tell us how much it could cost. Meanwhile, all coal-fired power stations in Australia are approaching their respective end-of-operational-life. More than a few coal-fired power stations will close over the next few decades in Australia. The AEMOโ€™s draft 2024 ๐˜๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜บ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ ๐˜—๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ, the latest version of its 30-year planning blueprint, suggests coal fired generation will be gone from Queensland and Victoria within a decade โ€“ by 2033/34 โ€“ and that the last coal unit will close in NSW by 2038. How does the Coalitionโ€™s nuclear policy solve Australiaโ€™s energy security needs if itโ€™s highly unlikely for any nuclear generator units to become operational in Australia before the mid-2040s at the earliest? How does the Coalitionโ€™s nuclear policy keep Australiaโ€™s โ€˜lights onโ€™ and ease the current cost-of-living crisis in the interim? How does it help Australians on fixed-incomes NOW? Answer: It doesnโ€™t, irrespective of how much it would cost! I'd suggest this issue is as serious as it can get. Scarce/unaffordable energy is an existential threat to Australia's national security. No energy, no economy. I'd suggest the Coalition are relying on having enough ill-informed/ignorant voters help them get back into political power, at the expense of Australia's energy security, and to stop the further expansion of renewables while keeping coal/gas going for as long as possible. ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ๐˜Œ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ published on 21 Jun 2024 an op-ed by Giles Parkinson headlined ๐——๐˜‚๐˜๐˜๐—ผ๐—ปโ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ป๐˜‚๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎโ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐˜† ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น๐—น. It included: """๐™Ž๐™ค ๐™ฌ๐™๐™–๐™ฉ ๐™ž๐™จ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ง๐™š๐™–๐™ก ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ฎ ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™š? ๐˜๐˜ตโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ค๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜จ๐˜บ ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ญ ๐˜ง๐˜ถ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜บ, ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜บ ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด. ๐˜๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ด, ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด, ๐˜ด๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ.""">> <<@mr.j1381 says : IF climate change is such a word changing threat to the world why tha price at all, if had to do with saving all the raptors in birds landing for machines with no moving parts at that one machine could replaced endless engineering problem forever, Nuclear Power would have solved theses problems but its overlooked and mocked so abundantly teenage mutant ninjas turtles, the Simpson's misinformation from HBO's mouths for others that will never going to work in the red since created always will be, one earthquake away from total rebuilds and retro fits endless problems, do you hear that bullet train heading to pick up passengers.>> <<@tonymarsh8436 says : Rubbish. You don't have to unban something to do a cost assessment.>> <<@brianlitson says : This is a goldmine for terrace ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚>> <<@darrylhalden1948 says : It will cost more much much more and will be decades delayed from whatever spin the coalition comes out with, you can put your house on that....and it wont lead to cheaper electricity that's a furphy>> <<@bushmagpie3312 says : Safety should priority and reliability Labor is worried about nuclear I would be more worried about battery fires as over last few months with vehicle fires while charging, large power system catching fire in US and now 20 killed in South Korea. Isnโ€™t this great for planet with toxic chemicals in atmosphere? Ask labour how many people and animals have been killed by renewable, 20 this week, 12 last year by wind turbines and tally grows. Nuclear power is way down scale, how many people died in Japan as a direct result of nuclear power station? The tsunami killed a lot of people didnโ€™t hear any of the nuclear power station. It was controlled. Ask were are the facts nuclear power is unsafe when renewables has killed a lot more people than nuclear. Batteries have killed more now than any nuclear power plant.>> <<@vincentburrowes9243 says : No Crises - We have had an increase in Natural Disasters in the last 10 Years - the insurance companies are raising their premiums or refusing to insure. Don't believe in climate crises - Fine - but we are all paying more with something to do with the weather / climate!>> <<@GStreet-o9z says : We need to lift the ban on nuclear power so we can build nuclear power plants.>> <<@Rob-el8ti says : it will also get cheaper as the workers get experience in building and it gets faster per built station, australia it will save you money in the long run wish the uk would build another 6 or 9>> <<@frogballs-y6c says : We will run out of power. Either new coal power plants or nuclear power. We NEED it. coal is cheaper, nukes are next, gas is third and the joke of solar/wind is last. follow the money, labour has been bought out to the detriment of us all...>> <<@imeagleeye1 says : Its a Con Job Spent nuclear fuel stays a radiation hazard for extended periods of time with half-lifes as high as 24,000 years. For example 10 years after removal from a reactor, the surface dose rate for a typical spent fuel assembly still exceeds 10,000 rem/hourโ€”far greater than the fatal whole-body dose for humans of about 500 rem received all at once.>> <<@edwindavis1818 says : And what do the scientists say? Sky News GARBAGE>> <<@dennismcdonnell7853 says : It used to be that if you followed the money, you would find the corruption. But now it is a case of follow the political power that is determined to break Australia's back, and you will see that the NWO puppets and infiltrators are pushing climate change and renewables to wreck our economy and get a NWO Communist takeover. A successful and cheap power system is the last thing that they want, and they do not want renewables to actually be successful either, which is why they are made to fail. Next, they will try to stop safe non-polluting batteries from being marketed.>> <<@stewatparkpark2933 says : Labor can't win an election without Green preferences so can never support nuclear .>> <<@milosradovanovic5280 says : Sorry, the ban has to be lifted emedietly, definitely ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโค๏ธ๐Ÿค—๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 6:28>> <<@milosradovanovic5280 says : Great, the ban on nuclear has to be done emedietly, definitely ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโค๏ธ๐Ÿค—๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 6:25>> <<@milosradovanovic5280 says : I do believe in science, costing has to be done properly , indepentdently done, because we have seen in climate chang debate , the highest institutions play politics not science,definitely ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโค๏ธ๐Ÿค—๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‘ 5:26>> <<@SebastianYap-xj9ju says : This is what wicked people babies spirit hate helper spirit of truth is word of Jesus christ so wicked people babies spirit love Antichrist spirit is their prophets spirit is Antichrist spirit Is their father Abraham spirit is Antichrist spirit said messiah is coming so Antichrist spirit said the messiah is coming so John baptist said testing the spirits so Antichrist spirit is Abraham children spirit deny life and resserection jesus christ flesh live forever so John baptist said testing the spirits so by their Abraham children spirit deeds so you know they Abraham children spirts are bad Seeds wolves in sheep clothing so how can Abraham children spirit bear good fruit flesh from tree of life in garden of Eden? Abraham children spirit is Antichrist spirit hate holy spirit is word of Jesus christ because Abraham children first hated life and resserection jesus christ flesh live forever so too Antichrist spirit is Abraham spirit hate helper spirit of truth is word of God so Abraham died and all the prophets died is proof Abraham cannot change Abraham spirit so too Abraham children cannot change Abraham children spirit so too God cannot change my spirit is God in heaven is proof bible book John verse 3-16 so Jesus christ is my flesh son because jesus christ gives helper spirit of truth shall take everything that belong to My flesh son jesus christ had already entered world. Jesus christ is son of God so Jesus christ is my son. My son has eyes like fire so too me is true God has eyes like fire and legs like bronze refined in fiery furnace so by deeds you know jesus christ has my eyes is eyes like fire so Jesus christ is my son because he has my eyes colour and they Abraham are not my children because of their defects their imperfections their blemishes so cast them Abraham children out into the outer darkness where they Abraham children shall surely weep gnash their teeth go into mourning.>> <<@Fred-Jai says : Why is Australia always run by self serving morons, can't really think of many politicians that are not over the last 3 decades. Don't think it's ever going to change.>> <<@ekka6560 says : Albo and Bowen are toast, among other things!>> <<@Aaronwhatnow says : Why do we need to lift the ban to run the numbers? Stupidity>> <<@BigFerg-hf6uv says : Labor back nuclear on subs but not land? Get your hand off it guys !! What a croc its stuff like this that makes Albo one of the most disliked PM's !! ๐Ÿ˜…>> <<@ianbuttery8693 says : Imagine if someone invents a fusion reactor in the near future. We'll still be stuck in the past!>> <<@bretloyd8097 says : Bullllllllllshiiiiiiiiiiiiit.>> <<@ianbuttery8693 says : With regard to domestic supply, 90% is to meet industry and business needs. 10% is required for home users.>> <<@mjohnstone2399 says : So whose backyard are they doing to put these nuclear plants and waste? By what year aiming to build these plants? 2050? Guess by that time they will actually have a costing.>> <<@noelrossbridge2514 says : We got a major problem, there's no cure for stupid and greenies are dumber than dog sh*t.>> <<@stoptheworldIwanttogetoff says : The Labor, Greens and the Teals parties will do their utmost to delay nuclear power in Australia for ideological not economic reasons. The only justifications they can put up are Simpson cartoons from last century.>> <<@ralphmogridge8364 says : $1.2 trillion+!! Dutton's already said it!!!>> <<@Super_Mario128 says : Cost of renewables :$1000000000 dollars Cost of Nuclear: $9.95>> <<@WilliamCarnell-k9g says : If renewable are so good drop the subsidies. Then we will find out what's the truth. Force renewables to pay for getting their power to the grid and provide the backup power when the wind don't blow and the sun don't shine!>> <<@1JohnnyUTAH says : Sky News under Orders by the Government to Hide the story of Pfizer been sued by Texas and Kansas for Lying about the Vaccine been Safe & Affective.>> <<@1JohnnyUTAH says : Australia is been hidden the truth by media and Politicians. Pfizer is in Court been Sued by Kansas &Texas for Lying about the Vaccine been Safe & Affective.>> <<@Dont_Gnaw_on_the_Kitty_1 says : What rubbish on Sky. The estimated cost is known, even the blowout in cost can be estimated as per 'The Gaurdian' article. Peer reviewed cost estimated at *$600 BILLION* leadtime around 20 years and coal used in this 20 year timeframe. You can guess who the Liberal donars are that is forcing this traitorous policy on Australia.>>
VideoPro
>>