Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@larryashman7258 says : Four clowns in a row reminds me of a sideshow tent, just without the ping pong balls.>> <<@freethinker4991 says : Sky news is ling to you all again! After watching this show I would suggest getting familiar Dave Borlace. BSc in Technology youtube shows on Nuclear which further suggest the Nuclear is not the answer link to shows. https://www.youtube.com/c/JustHaveaThink/search?query=Nuclear>> <<@interwebtubes says : Yeah, just to let everyone know, The highway system in the United States was, Or should I correctly say is part of the of the United States emergency defense System , Where odd number routes traverse north-south, For example interstates 45 runs north south between Houston and Dallas, Intrastate 51 runs north-south on the east coast of that country, Even number routes run east-west, For example, Interstates 20,30, & 10 in the state of Texas, Three d digit routes are bypasses, with the first digit indicates the number of miles of the bypass, For example interstate 6-10 is a 6 mile bypass around interstate 10 in Houston Texas, And intrastate 2-10 is a two mile bypass around interstate 10 in lake Charles Louisiana , And intrastate 405 is an 4 mile bypass around interstate 5 in Los Angeles California, Please keep in mind how very large the states are, And don’t forget that they use miles, not kilometers , Definitely something different, Stay safe everyone and please remember to keep your hands clean and washed up at all times>> <<@msanthropic5401 says : No it isn’t, it makes perfect sense. Because if they accept nuclear then the problem is solved, and there’s no money or control to be gained unless there’s a problem. Preferably an EMERGENCY.>> <<@petert24turner71 says : Instead of just commenting, do something realistic, who gives a shit about highways.>> <<@breakawaymotorsports says : Since the splitting of the atom cancer rates have skyrocketed. Fact. Humans don't do well with radiation ,unless it is 93 million miles away (the Sun) Climate change due to man is very controversial even amongst scientists. So..until there is a better alternative to a KNOWN killer (more nuclear radiation) oil is mans best friend. It is nothing more than stored sunlight energy and is 100% natural.>> <<@playlisttarmac says : Politically I sit in the middle (although the far right would call me left because I sometimes do not agree with them "shock horror"). However, I am very much pro nulear as the way I see it the benefits of nuclear power far outweigh the risks. Lobbiests including oil and gas lobbiests have kept the debate anti nuclear over the last couple of decades to line their own pockets by scaring people who care about the environment that nuclear will destroy the environment. Its usually always about money and who wants to protect thier own interests.>> <<@andocommando3071 says : Considering SMRs have a very recent history of lengthy delays and cost overruns across Europe, Russia, China and America, along with Australia now over a trillion dollars in debt after the Coalition government, maybe it's not so nonsensical a position to take.>> <<@frankhiggs4141 says : Why can't these prawns understand Australia is not allowed to have nuclear power for general use, yet they harp on and on about it for frack sake the owners said no ok little children.>> <<@bucket6386 says : Actually, every energy expert in Australia says that nuclear is too costly compared to other renewables and will take too long to implement Sky news journos, are you guys experts on energy? Or are you simply journalists paid by coal companies?>> <<@JD-oc3jx says : The LNP has a new bandwagon. The banks won't back it.>> <<@VitZ9 says : Imagine having the world's largest supply of Uranium, and an eastern seaboard covered in hundreds of dormant volcanoes, and not investing in Nuclear or Geothermal power for decades just because some tree hugging environmentalists said no. And that joke ladies and gentlemen, is called Australia.>> <<@perpetualgrin5804 says : Sky still trying for Nuclear power, decades on. Don't like their chances.>> <<@haroldmclean3755 says : I Dream of a Future of Unlimited Power for Industry and Cheap power for All Australians, Nuclear energy is just SO SEXY ⚛️👍>> <<@carcusminsden1310 says : No problem lets build some! Just need to find 20billion per reactor, wait 15 years while they're built, find somewhere to build them, overturn the ban, get people to vote for it, get someone to insure it....yes it's easy! We'll just 100% wind, solar and batteries while you RWNJs sort that out.>> <<@chrishewitt1165 says : Watch the greens' heads explode..... Global climate objectives fall short without nuclear power in the mix: UNECE>> <<@lesjayco7785 says : Always with the wicked witch of the weft Sky News. People are a bit more nuanced than your black and white view point.>> <<@tagiscom says : Agreed Albo climate Muppet keeps telling us Nuclear is very expensive while an expert with 30 years experience tells us it is half the cost of solar and wind. I guess that means albo's muppet in charge of climate change is psychology deranged and on advise from a shrink needs to go.>> <<@positivepawpaw7564 says : SHELLENBERGER - On behalf of environmentalists everywhere, I would like to formally apologize for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years. Climate change is happening. It's just not the end of the world. It's not even our most serious environmental problem. I may seem like a strange person to be saying all of this. I have been a climate activist for 20 years and an environmentalist for 30. But as an energy expert asked by Congress to provide objective expert testimony, and invited by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to serve as Expert Reviewer of its next Assessment Report, I feel an obligation to apologize for how badly we environmentalists have misled the public. Here are some facts few people know: Humans are not causing a "sixth mass extinction" The Amazon is not "the lungs of the world" Climate change is not making natural disasters worse Fires have declined 25% around the world since 2003 The amount of land we use for meat — humankind's biggest use of land — has declined by an area nearly as large as Alaska The build-up of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explain why there are more, and more dangerous, fires in Australia and California Carbon emissions are declining in most rich nations and have been declining in Britain, Germany, and France since the mid-1970s Netherlands became rich not poor while adapting to life below sea level We produce 25% more food than we need and food surpluses will continue to rise as the world gets hotter Habitat loss and the direct killing of wild animals are bigger threats to species than climate change Wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels Preventing future pandemics requires more not less "industrial" agriculture I know that the above facts will sound like "climate denialism" to many people. But that just shows the power of climate alarmism.>> <<@Drakesy says : 4 people with zero qualifications and on knowledge of nuclear playing off their own confirmation bias. Bunch of flogs>> <<@positivepawpaw7564 says : YOU WILL OWN NOTHING & BE HAPPY .. YOU WILL EAT BUGS & WEEDS,, & DRINK SEWAGE. THE DEMENTED LEFT WILL FIGHT TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN.>> <<@enfredlindstrom6763 says : MI5 and FBI have said that the WEF is back and ran by the CCP .>> <<@abubakar_Abson says : Great content, Money is worthless until you put it to work.... I made my 1st million investing in Crypto. Making money is the plan and with investing in crypto your plans can be fulfilled.>> <<@Ich_slage_dich_in_dominos says : Wind turbine kills birds>> <<@OilCanHarry2U says : This session should be called “Four Fucknuckles in a Row”.>> <<@bill3428 says : Wonder who is funding Sky News for this BS rhetoric on water cooled nuclear? Molten Salt Reactors are the right way forward. Indonesia is getting one soon from ThorCon.>> <<@lappo253 says : We can't even build a broadband network which functions and you muthafakers want a nuclear power plant???>> <<@richardtiiird8464 says : If we harness the hot air that politicians and Journalists produce then we could run some sort of environmental project, but I digress . Nuclear is the way to go as long as China doesn't build it. China steals others technology and destroys the maiden company by producing cheaper and less reliable products.>> <<@joeymadding3788 says : If you like nuclear power we put the waste in your yard or your basement so whoever wants the power you get the waist in you're yard.... then we'll see how much you like oh yeah your family and here it's your mess too so they get to keep it after you die your family gets to keep it cuz of your decisions about nuclear power>> <<@alwaysright3718 says : The left want to live in caves eating bugs, and we are heading that way...>> <<@simonharris4873 says : 2:12 That's why.>> <<@simonharris4873 says : They used to say that in Fukushima too. Not so much today.>> <<@gw5436 says : I don't see you you lot don't get it. Anyone with a brain knows nuclear power is the answer to the no-CO2 future. But that's not what it's all about, it's about changing society and destroying the middle class, and the taking over of everything by the one-world government. Nuclear solves the CO2 issue, but that ruins the scam...Trying to reason with these country-destroying politicians is useless.>> <<@mmccbb7mcb278 says : Green Party of Finland has come out openly and endorsed Nuclear energy.>> <<@coal_man says : Coal shares are booming. Massive profits. Whitehaven Coal.>> <<@KJ-yk4nq says : It’s an interesting contradiction. suggests not really motivated in solving the problem they’re claiming to be?>> <<@martthvdb9701 says : The technology has really been advanced in the last decades? Don't get me wrong: I'am pro nuclear, but today's nuclear (PWR) powerplants are essentially the same as they were developed in the 1950s for nuclear submarines. All experimental (breeder) programs have been terminated by the left. Most notably: the IFR program .>> <<@Jd-zr8bs says : Because it works and they can't run the scam of neverending purchases of failing green energy , solar panels, windmills etc that suck.One step closer to eating bugs and owning nothing>> <<@ianross225 says : Wind and solar are best described as undependable baseload. No wind or sun no power. It’s that simple.>> <<@ianross225 says : The Left is synonymous with nonsensical.>> <<@truckerenoch8824 says : They're hopelessly brainwashed (and waxed) by corporations who pretend to be "green" and con them with things that are *MUCH* less "green". I like the new one where detergent companies are making half sized plastic bottles (to cut plastic polution), but the soap isn't any more concentrated and people are still doing the same amount laundry, so the "half bottles" seem green, but people are having to buy 2 bottles (meaning more money too. Since smaller portions always cost more), which takes *DOUBLE* the carbon footprint to manufacture and deliver!🙄 Wow, l¡bs are *_STUPID!!!_*>> <<@michaelmurray11189 says : "BuT bUt BuT bUt, ChErNoByL aNd FuKuShImA." "BuT bUt BuT bUt, Da RaDiAtIoN." About the most overused and lousiest arguments used by those who oppose nuclear power.>> <<@ChrisBNisbet says : As is their opposition to fossil fuels.>> <<@KadinWhitney says : Lets Go Brandon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIqTvn2YH5I>> <<@chaseshadow says : NUCLEAR doesn't even exist GOON SQUAD !!! When do you awaken from the SPELL hmmmm . . . . .>> <<@georgedavidson1221 says : C02 does not cause global warming. Green energy is a total scam>> <<@georgedavidson1221 says : Why do they always show water vapour coming cooling towers and claim it is pollution>> <<@glenminnick3724 says : Nuke the left! Haaaaa... eff em all , bitches!>> <<@fredbear9073 says : Nice pictures of cooking towers. That white stuff is steam.😂😂😂😂>> <<@crazydingo8974 says : Nuclear is the greenest there is ….as the lady says, technology has moved forward , Australia must go nuclear, 👍👍👍>>