Nuclear one of the only 'guaranteed pathways' to net zero
Nuclear one of the only 'guaranteed pathways' to net zero
Advertisement

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

LATEST COMMENTS

@hotwheels70 Says:
whats the obsession with the net zero nonsense? Their big fear is the temperature will increase by 1.5C in 100 years. if we use coal, cheap, plentiful and 100% reliable everyone can afford to use their air cons when its 1.5C warmer.
@JosefMengeleNHS Says:
Co2 out of those chimneys. Undisposable waste. Green my arse.
@kkcw6668 Says:
The real nett ZERO = If the entire Southern Hemisphere went into suspended animation (whole hemisphere time capsule, man, machine & beast) for the rest of 3rd Millennium, thats 975.5 years the difference it would make is absolutely ZERO. Do your own modelling research, or just ask NASA & JPL for their historical data to give you an intellectual leg up!
@jennymills3147 Says:
Anthony albanese failed the voice. Failed inflation. Failed energy costs. Failed cost of living. Failed border security. Failed immigration. Failed leadership.
@johnwalsh9285 Says:
Thank you sky news
@howlernorthamerica5899 Says:
Nuclear waste has a long half life, but spent solar arrays and wind turbine blades that are being buried and mined by children slaves are very toxic as well. 😒
@mattmacca3990 Says:
Open to it … because it WORKS…
@PamelaPhillips-ed9sl Says:
Grumpy Grandpa here. You would have to move off the planet before that happens. Until then it's only a daydream. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ‘
@larrylongprong5219 Says:
Virgin
@bestestusername Says:
Remember, the people most angry at nuclear are those who will lose government funding for green projects which either don't work or are short term. None want government owned generation
@gregtaylor207 Says:
@gregtaylor207 0 seconds ago Lets look into what is making Albosleazy and The Ministry of Corruption wet their pants. Look up Clean Energy Finance Corporation and see for yourself it was given 35 billion to finance start ups and companies of our funds and the 2 Ministers in control of this as Chief Members of the Board are no other than Chris Bowen and Katy Gallagher along with six or more laborites as board members. They have sighed eye watering contracts to finance many overseas corporations to carry out buying Large Farms to install renewables. Bloomberg Finance in America have estimated that to complete installing renewables the CEFC will require Trillions of dollars of our money to complete renewable installation and Trillions more to install all the poles and wires.
@np2917 Says:
Australia have largest Uranium reserve and Australian is not using Nuclear power plant... It is foolish... Like asking Saudi Arabia to don't drive petrol car. Or asking German people to don't use Mercedes or BMW.. Country must use own resources to prosper own people.. πŸ˜‡ With electric car electricity demand will go 25X in Australia. If is it expensive then how Vietnam, India, and other countries can afford..!. πŸ˜‡
@windsong3wong828 Says:
Did anyone tell you that the Chinese is ahead of the USA in nuke technology by 15 years ? The current 2 nuke plant being build in USA is behind schedule and above cost.
@trickyboy1517 Says:
The other way renewable energy, Billy. And guess what? We'll decarbonise sooner and cheaper too. ;)
@steveblake6877 Says:
William is speaking for the aspirations of intelligent young people. Albanese and Bowen and their incompetent ministers are speaking for the Greens. Not speaking for us. And their stupid loser policies are sending us over a cliff. God bless William. Smart. Informed. Brave.
@darrellhartzog7602 Says:
Form those that say nuclear reactors are clean energy then move to Chernobyl or scenic Fukushima. What about the wastewater from the reactors when it has to be changed oh but it is within tolerant levels then you use the water for everyday use, bath, laundry, drink it. Until there is a way to neutralize radioactive waste. This is dangerous there is not a safe place on earth to even consider any possibility of release of this radioactivity even the smallest risk is too much to destroy miles of earth for how many hundreds of thousands of years. The planet is not stable its surface is always shifting and moving just because one cannot see this in their lifetime does not mean it doesn't move. Neutralize the radioactivity in Chernobyl and Fukushima where it is safe to live first when that can happen then say it is safe.
@TrickyBoy1517. Says:
Come on *Tricky Boy* You triggered FH 😎 Have one of your interchangeable little whinges ;)
@Highbudget Says:
The only viable option to create zero emissions and provide stable and reliable energy to everyone
@Diponty Says:
It's like Net Zero is the holy Grail FFS. Oh let's worship Net Zero. Ummm Ummm Ummm Ummm. What about Net Zero power bills?
@foff3379 Says:
We dont need net zero trees have aright to breathe too pump the coal stuff windmills
@satriojumeneng7055 Says:
If that's true, then China would have implemented it a long time ago.
@baldbull4397 Says:
Get ready for a β€œ nuclear tragedy” to pump up the fear and anti nuclear propaganda
@__Diagnosis Says:
I suggest William doubles his protein, carb and fat intake. Start of slowly in the gym first with light weights Go heavy weights, and once he has gained weight, cut carbs a little and increase protein. In no time he will bench press 50kg and squat 100kgs.
@GrandpaVince Says:
The only problem is radiation damage can lead to ghoulification and already has in tasmania
@tamimrktz6966 Says:
Nuclear is the ONLY real renewable as it provides clean, affordable, and unlimited energy.

More Australia Videos