Macedone Legal Principal Sam Macedone says Johnny Depp won his case in the US because his legal team were able to 'get into Heard's credibility'.
'Every allegation that Heard made, they seemed to have an answer for it, they seemed to be able to cross-examine her in such a way that there was some doubt,' Mr Macedone told Sky News Australia.
Mr Macedone also said he personally did not think Amber Heard's chances at appeal were very good, citing the US court decision being on a factual basis.
'And appeal courts don't really want to look at whether the facts are correct or not.'
This only proves the British ruling was ridiculous, Judge Nicol was simply corrupted by Rupert Murdoc, refusing the police statement and any testimony in favour of JD and only giving value to innuendos from Amber Heard... if you read the British ruling this was totally BS... end of story.
@violetvixen493 Says:
She was not cross examined in the UK- the judge just took her words as truth-- when she's really a huge LIAR !!
@wendyl3150 Says:
The only time that Amber was invited to court by DEPP she lost, in the UK she invited herself to be a witness against her ex husband.
@leavemealone802 Says:
I thought the UK case was about something that didn't relate to Amber accusing him to abuse her.
I know the UK case isn't related to the US case, after all they couldn't use it to win this one.... but I not sure why
@annylaurie422 Says:
If it not been televised we would have been feed msm garbage - which even after the verdict they are still peddling lies
@humanidee118 Says:
She will win
@bibiblocksberg7051 Says:
AH as an narcissist gets now the attention she was ever dreaming of. And as we know from the trial, she always finds people to pay for her. So, I could imagine that she would be presumptuous enough to do it again. Maybe she think, that she now learn enough from the body language vids, to be a better actriss in the stand than before.
Second, in my opinion, some medias push a controversial discussion just to have high ratings. For this, they put a "t**d" on someone's dignity or the truth...
@MsSilkyJuneja Says:
In UK the judge’s son was one of the SUN Magazines trustee , and Elon also had other direct influence over the case
@maryanderson2759 Says:
Absolutely incorrect about people being allowed to see the trial. We all know that the media doesn’t tell us the truth. This way, we got to watch and decide for ourselves
@annylaurie422 Says:
That god it was televised or we would be still listening the crap msm is still pushing even after they the truth
@GtsAntoni1 Says:
He won in the US because it was a *completely different case*
Comparing the two suits is stupid
@TomTomson81 Says:
Equal rights for all. Johnny was publicly judged by Amber's false, slanderous statements without trial. The fact that he now publicly shows that everything was a lie is only logical and just. The jury has judged and not social media. Social media had no influence on the verdict. However, social media has been enlightened. And social media doesn't like to be lied to. Everything Amber is going through now could have been avoided from her side in the first place. Just don't lie.
Anyone who publicly defames a person worldwide may also be held publicly accountable for it.
@jenns.5791 Says:
the UK trial was very different.
also, I'm glad the U.S. trial was televised. JOHNNY had the right to show the world exactly what was going on. and jury isn't supposed to pay attention to outside influences so that's no excuse to not televise it.
@DaniMra12 Says:
I am glad the trial was live. The media (at least in my country, Brazil) was shamelessly biased during the case. Those who only followed the news on tradicional media were deceived
@froggielovesnature4751 Says:
The trial in the Uk was between the sun newspaper and J.D amber was only a witness! It was completely different to the American trial!
@trilui3139 Says:
Please appeal so i can laugh at her acting again
@isacabral7103 Says:
I agree
@SquirrilahFish Says:
Here in the states, we wish that ALL trails were streamed online, unless there's a strong reason not too. In the 18th century, the entire town used to show up for jury trials. A public showing of all proceedings might go a long way into repairing, what is frankly, a very broken, and corrupt legal system.
@Batman-vr6jp Says:
Cannot appeal
@chenlee9835 Says:
I think even for heard to appeal, she would need to put the money up as a bond.
@CrystalShadow Says:
She’s the abuser! She physically, mentally, and emotionally tortured that man. There was no win for her in the UK she was a witness only. It was against the Sun which is a dirty little tag owned by rupert murdoch the one who isn’t too found of democracy. She was dining with the judges family and the judge should have refused to take the case due to his son being on the paper. Conflicts of interest all around. Corruption!
@clovermark39 Says:
The UK TRIAL was not against Heard but against a newspaper.
@stellaallbright4750 Says:
If the Depp v. Heard case would not have been televised, the media would have everyone believing she WON!! This trial has me believing ALL trials should be televised.
For example, this interview claims that AH won in the UK when AH was not even part of that lawsuit, aside from giving a deposition as a witness, this was a defamation lawsuit brought by JD against The Sun.
Another example of journalists & media outlets spreading disinformation.
@izzeypally Says:
if it wasn't televised, Amber could claim whatever she wanted afterwards about how everyone was so unfair and how great her evidence was. She can't wiggle out of it because we all saw it
@Chris78986 Says:
Heard tried to lump JD with the recent high profile trials of abusers but her lying was caught out left right and center.
@lawneymalbrough4309 Says:
These kind of trials should never be televised. It's not really news in the first place because these celebrities are not liked by everyone. Many people could care less about their personal lives.
Mee too is an activist group who would have all men convicted because she said so. Wait till a woman accused them of something. Maybe Depp will make more movies. As for me I probably won't watch any of them. I just don't like the guy. He's not much of an actor in my book
@shelly7909 Says:
It was against the sun in the uk not her in America it was agains her the case in are. Country we are fully equipped to understand that theses case were from different cases she did not win nothing it was against the sun Rupert Murdock I exstreamly expect he is good friends with Elon and pri. Andrew Jefferson who is dead now and she holiness el hand awaiting her sentence or if she now has.
@andreasavanna5666 Says:
The reason it was televised was because of the UK trial. Johnny wanted his voice heard because of the corrupt judge in the UK. He deserved to have his point heard.
@coffee6783 Says:
Read the letter addressed to Amber's sister Whitney from her great friend Jennifer Howell and you'll be in no doubt that Amber is the abuser. According to the letter, Whitney told people in Jennifer's office, including Jennifer, that it was Amber who tried to push Whitney down the stairs - not Johnny who tried to push Amber - and that it was Amber who cut Johnny's finger off. These two sisters are trying to fleece Johnny for all he has with nothing but lies.
@MrCircus29 Says:
Why do these commentators allow interviewees to continue to say Amber Heard won in the UK? Amber Heard was not a party in that case. Johnny Depp sued the Sun. The sun one that case. News commentators lately are just about as bad as they can get.
@marymaezellefalcon2967 Says:
UK WAS JUST DEAF TO JD’s situation . Didn’t listen to the facts. The judge in UK was BIASED from the beginning
@nosumone Says:
Her dog stepped on a Bee though!!
@Bloodfireclothing Says:
Wow blocking comments, sky?😂
@Bloodfireclothing Says:
The media exposed themselves. It’s all full of crap.😂
@akay5118 Says:
Amber is an abuser and she only represents abusers, total Liar. Lool
@hohoohooohoooo6900 Says:
Amber heard into ash heard
@rushelm8101 Says:
This case aside, given that most humans can generally at times be nasty, how is it that female humans come off better and present more realistically as victims? Where does that prejudice come from, when we know that just as many women as men can lie and behave so atrociously?
Also, as unfashionable as it is to ask the 'elephant in the room' question, shouldn't we try to understand what role women play in genuine cases of DV, instead of shovelling sand on the issue to obfuscate the root cause of unacceptable response behaviour?
Another question. Why don't we genuinely care about male victims, including male victims of other men? This is plainly a prejudice.
All it takes for a woman to harm a man is to recruit another male to do her bidding, or pull a trigger herself, something that an alarming amount of women are capable of.
If you are a thinking person, you will think these issues through, if you are an activist, you won't bother because you won't be interested in solutions that reframe your worldview.
@avrilvb Says:
I'm glad it was televised so that we could all see her lies.
@Alina-bb5fp Says:
This is the only TV program that is telling the truth right now!
@Yaya00000 Says:
The case in the UK was not against Amber so there for the rules of discovery were not the same for her or Depp so no the uk and us trial were not the same
@docducttape9270 Says:
They didn't just get into it, they absolutely gutted her credibility. ☠️ ☠️
@taufiknoor2571 Says:
Her "EX-HUSBAND" to put it right.
@greaterbayareahero1401 Says:
To put the icing on the cake, Camille should be offered the role of Mera in Aquaman 2;)
@niseep Says:
I'm glad we the public got to see and hear Heard admit she HIT him and the way she belittled and needled him. Clearly Heard was NOT an abused wife and her dishonesty was revealed Clear. Withoutcthe cameras so WE coukd hear the evidence and testimony Depp couldn't have vleared his name. Amber Heard in my opinion is extremely dishonest and actually dangerous. God help that child!!!
@travismurell5228 Says:
What credibility?
@xavineira9403 Says:
It has been a set back for ppl taking a shit on beds and dogs stepping on 🐝
@nolanparkin5654 Says:
Interview people who watched the trail.....really!
@dexterlogan7062 Says:
He had it televised because she kept lying and the public didnt believe JD, he wanted the truth out finally. Johnny Depp seems to be a private person so that was a very big decision for him to make after 6 years, he wanted to claim his life back again and he felt this was the only way to do it .Amber Heard was stating multiple lies and kept adding to them as the time went on very publicly to promote herself and ruin his life. He wasnt given much choice in the matter, it was a very good decision he made in this case...
@robertlavigne6560 Says:
I believe this is a statement that both genders can be abused. Abusers tell their victims that nobody will believe them. Amber was recorded saying exactly that! And she admitted on tape that she started a physical fight.
LATEST COMMENTS