Albanese's response to China's flare incident 'so weak' it is a 'national security issue'
Albanese's response to China's flare incident 'so weak' it is a 'national security issue'
Advertisement

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

LATEST COMMENTS

@iawy8264 Says:
"Albanese seemed like a puppy desperate for a pat from is Master Chairman Xi" πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜… So true
@user-ht9iu1et9h Says:
Weak b,talking to his ccp mates
@richardnovak9910 Says:
Diplomacy makes us look stupid. Handsome boys gotta man up.
@user-td6yt5rs1x Says:
So he lied again "every level". I think not
@DanG-hh7bi Says:
Albo is such a horses hoof.
@kenbehrens5778 Says:
The only national security problem is that we were spying on China within a few hundred km of their capital. The Exclusive economic zone of China is off limits.
@freespirit4162 Says:
It no secret Australia obeys USA.. shouldn't Australia patrol closer water Shores..beware Australia becomes next proxy war player like Ukraine and Russia
@freespirit4162 Says:
Dutton Boss USAπŸ™πŸ€πŸ€£
@connorduke4619 Says:
Albo's obedience has probably earned him the same ranking as Dan Andrews within the CCP by now! Although probably still one tier below Commie Paul Keating.
@freespirit4162 Says:
Why Australia in Yellow Sea..check map..Why There. Who ordered flight Route path There.. Australia travelled TOWARDS China...
@wilsonmung3044 Says:
He is originally a soft and incompetent person by nature
@trumpbuddha1053 Says:
Australia: We have the rights to navigate in the International water China: We have the rights to release flare into the International water. Australia cries.
@user-pk9fm4zh1g Says:
China to Australia. If you argue China will stop buying lobster and wine. So shud up , do not say anything. Ok.
@ak-rx1ui Says:
In all games of international brinkmanship, the losers will argue who was right and who was wrong. The real question is who backed off first? That guy lost.πŸ˜…
@soowo5942 Says:
Australia is so angry, then what? Call your master the united snakes for help! China won't talk to lap dogs anyway. It's about time to know your place Australia: an insignificant lap dog of the United snakes.
@AnchorsAweighNarooma Says:
Send the ambassador home for a holiday until he can explaine the reason for the action, Place a Chine tax on imports. Labor get real, I know the weekend is close but pull a finger before we all get older. Albo lies again and again he did nothing.
@lockieharris2005 Says:
Bring on Pauline Hanson.
@nigelmorgan3449 Says:
Albo where’s ya hat cowgirl
@meipakyu4688 Says:
There is nothing AUS can do! If Albo criticise China, China will just bring back wine tarrifs! As usual, CCP will deny it and put the blame back to AUS! The same way CCP treat the Phil!. Next, China will claim that Xi and Keating had gentlemen's agreement that AUS is giving Tasmania to China by 2030!
@vincemultari3423 Says:
My dogs arse looks better than Albos head trust me his not a pretty boy more like a busted arse
@vincemultari3423 Says:
I can run the country better than labour just give me one term and let me pick my team Wayne Bennet can b my treasurer
@vincemultari3423 Says:
Albo is the biggest vagina Australia has
@yugo6262 Says:
NOW you can feel it....... The BULLY thing.....πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
@Koala63211 Says:
I feel very worried when I cannot believe a single word coming out of the mouth of our Prime Minister and his Noddies standing around him. This "Game Playing" by foreign forces was going on when I was in the Australian Navy from 1964 to 1984. I served on ships where our Captain pushed the boundaries as well. It does no good when supposed media reporters use the term "Attacked" on a simple tit for tat game like Mr Bolt has just done.
@ben_astro Says:
We will kowtow to China
@davu5637 Says:
The truth of the matter is that politicians in the West and the US including Australia (Australia which is psychologically totally confused and suffering from an identity crisis as it thinks it is "west" when the reality is that it is geographically part of Asia!!!), are still stuck in their mental capacity and attitude in the glory days of "empire" 5-6 centuries ago. They may have learned to wear Gucci suits nowadays but nothing else seem to have evolved in their psyche and consciousness from their barbarian days. Instead of recognising their sordid past and history , they celebrate their delusions like "Thanksgiving Day" which the Native American Indians rightly and clearly remember and commemorate as their "Day of Mourning" being the beginning of the murdering, genociding, plundering, stealing, raping and ultimately, OCCUPATION , of their land uninvited, without any due compensation even till today. But these thieves and robbers take a lot of pride in the stories they tell themselves and sell to the world how great their "founding" was!!! Same stories with the "Empire" where the sun never sets. Australia with the Aborigines. New Zealand with their Maoris. The African continent with all those Europeans...........it goes on and on. This is the 21st Century , for chrissakes! Grow up and come out of that sick and primitive mentality of never ending desire to dominate, control and subjugate. The zillions of dollars spent on wars and "defence" and the other zillions being hoarded by the 1% is more than sufficient to provide every human being on the planet a very decent and never anything wanting life on this planet with the healthiest and cleanest environment. And we pride ourselves as being the only creature on earth with the intelligence, consciousness and capacity of free will and choice. And these sick politicians choose never ending squabbles, tensions and wars!!! Go figure. Expert:The U.S. in no position to be the cardinal arbiter of what democracy is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2A-tuK23zY German expert: Different systems can cooperate if united by interest of all of mankind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53o7975LrEs Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPt-zXn05ac Gen Wesley Clark Reveals US Plan To Invade Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Lybia, Somalia, Sudan, And Iran https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GsDD-9hZ9s&list=PLIQ_UnYxBz6WUsBQRpOduLpYHzWLS0edt&index=369 Julian Assange on Afghan war in a 2011 video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IGU_7alJ80 It is not important to measure democracy by Western standards scholar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W0GIKH22DQ How Britain Stole Hong Kong and Forced China to Buy Heroin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1uRhiY-fXM Justice may be delayed, but it will not be denied. https://twitter.com/MFA_China/status/1470759624689152000 Drone Whistleblower Daniel Hale Says Crisis of Conscience Motivated Leak https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/07/23/pre-sentencing-letter-drone-whistleblower-daniel-hale-says-crisis-conscience A reality check: Exporting war under veil of democracy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isib_uZpkGI Uyghur Tribunal: US-Funded Theater Attacking China https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt9G0p0dqYU The Uyghur Tribunal: US-funded Theater (Complete References) https://newatlas.report/2021/10/01/the-uyghur-tribunal-us-funded-theater-complete-references/ American activist and social media expert Jerry Day has called on the American nation to recognize the war crimes the U.S. government, military and corporate deep-state have committed in the Middle East and rest of the world. β€œThey [U.S.] are simply bombing whatever they want to bomb, killing whoever they want to kill, destroying whatever they choose to destroy without legal grounds. We are the new global villain," said Day. https://www.yenisafak.com/en/video-gallery/news/us-is-new-global-villain-says-american-activist-2167332 Broken Treaties https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOeGTWYv8Hc The Warmonger's Legacy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jkb1f5eqUpM Biden, like Trump, breaks international law, violating UN neutrality by blocking countries https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfjqzAY_mEc PROPAGANDA, FAKE News and Plain LIES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYoxFNM0fRc Who's pushing Africa to China? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlEZcTQWskM World Debt Clocks https://www.usdebtclock.org/world-debt-clock.html From 1964 to 1973, the U.S. dropped more than two million tons of ordnance on Laos during 580,000 bombing missionsβ€”equal to a planeload of bombs every 8 minutes, 24-hours a day, for 9 years – making Laos the most heavily bombed country per capita in history. The bombings were part of the U.S. Secret War in Laos to support the Royal Lao Government against the Pathet Lao and to interdict traffic along the Ho Chi Minh Trail. The bombings destroyed many villages and displaced hundreds of thousands of Lao civilians during the nine-year period. Five years ago, the US forces, using the fake intelligence of a staged video by β€œWhite Helmets” as evidence, conducted the so-called β€œmost precise air strikes in history” in Syria, killing more than 1,600 innocent civilians. In recent years, the international community has been calling for investigations into the killing of civilians in the US’ overseas military operations. On Syria alone, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic pointed out several times in its reports in September 2019 and February 2021 that the US failed to distinguish military targets from civilians in its air strikes in Syria, which gravely violates international humanitarian law and may constitute war crimes. However, the US government has been turning a deaf ear to all this.  According to reports, over the past nearly two decades, the US conducted over 90,000 air strikes in countries including Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, which may have killed up to 48,000 civilians. But the US military time and again covered up the facts and refused to apologize, admit its crimes or hold the perpetrators accountable. It did everything possible to evade its responsibilities. On the drone strike of civilians in Afghanistan, a Pentagon spokesperson said openly in December 2021 that no US soldiers will face disciplinary action over it. The US media also disclosed at the end of last year that from 2014 to 2019, the US military turned its guns on farmers in the middle of harvest, children playing in the streets, families fleeing the fighting and villagers taking shelter in buildings. These disastrous crimes were deliberately concealed and whitewashed. US media revealed last year that according to the US military’s own confidential assessments of more than 1,300 reports of civilian casualties, civilian casualties in US air strikes have been β€œsignificantly undercounted”. Larry Lewis, a Director at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) of the US said that on average at least one incident of civilian harm has happened every week since 9/11. There has been an overall pattern of negligence with regard to the US government on the issue of civilian harm. The US has also obstructed the International Criminal Court’s investigations into its war crimes in Afghanistan.  Every human life, regardless of nationality, race, religion or values, is equal and precious. The US should earnestly respond to the strong call of the international community, conduct a credible, independent and impartial investigation into civilian casualties caused by US air strikes, and hold the people concerned accountable. The End of American Exceptionalism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZU0IXO7AQw&t=233s Lost Angeles: City of Homeless https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJt3xuTPRVU GLOBALink | Malawian president lauds China for waiving African countries' interest-free loanshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L0XfaaY-do World Debt clocks https://www.usdebtclock.org/world-debt-clock.html
@davu5637 Says:
South China Sea Dispute There has been a lot of articles South China Sea (SCS) dispute and China’s 9 Dash Line articles in recent time, with a majority of them twisting facts and trying to claim that China is bullying smaller countries with their growing military might when China is simply trying to reclaim what is rightfully theirs. In 1946 at the end of WW2 it was a US Navy battleship that took Chinese soldiers to reclaim all the islands that are currently under dispute in the SCS as China simply lacked capable ship at the time. Thus, the original R.O.C 11 Dash Line was drawn in 1947 after China recovered all the islands, the 11 Dash Line linked all the islands together to clearly mark China territorial waters which was at the time recognized by the American and international community. The 11 Dash Line was only reduced to the 9 Dash Line when China secretly transferred Bach Long Vi in the Gulf of Tonkin from China to Vietnam in 1957 so that the island could host a new radar base to provide an early warning of American planes and to serve as a transitional post for Vietnam incoming war aid material as the Vietnam War escalated. It was a goodwill and war aid material from China to support Vietnam against the US invasion. From this, we can tell how ungrateful and traitorous the Vietnamese are with their current aggressive stances toward China. Furthermore, all historical document sign by or involved any of the countries associated with the current disputes didn't lay any claim to any of the island involved in the current SCS dispute. For example: β€” In the 1898 Paris Treaty signed between America and Spain, both countries acknowledged that none of the disputed islands belong to the Philippines as the Philippines territory extends to the east of east meridian 118 while the dispute islands laid west of east Meridian 118. β€” In the 1945 Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender contained the following statement: β€˜β€™the Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku, and such minor islands as we determine,” as had been announced in the Cairo Declaration in 1943; which clearly stated it didn't include Diaoyu Islands. In addition, the Cairo Declaration in 1943 also clearly stated all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese shall be restored to the Republic of China (that represented China at the time) and these documents were signed with Chinese participation. The American recognition of the 11 Dash Line lasted until San Francisco Conference in 1951 when the American specifically excluding China from the conference as the Communist Party in China-controlled most of mainland China at the time and proclaimed the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949. At the San Francisco Conference, the American made unilateral arrangement in an attempt to deny Chinese ownership of their islands that was previously international recognised belonging to China and put all these islands into a dispute. However, at the time no one including the current neighbouring claimants bothered to dispute China's claim to these islands and reefs, but China also did not have the ability to consistently enforce its sovereignty to these islands due to lack of military power and internal weakness caused by WW2 and the Civil War. Neighbouring states only started to violate China's claim, occupying certain islands and reefs when it was speculated that the South China Sea might contain oil and gas. For example: β€” During the San Francisco Treaty of 1951 in the absence of China and with the support of the American, the Philippine claim ownership of the disputed island, nevertheless the Philippine did not declare ownership of the disputed islands until late 1970 by self-proclamation. β€” The America took over the administrative duty of Diaoyu Islands at San Francisco Conference from China and promised to relay it to UN which they never did. The American kept the administrative rights until 1971 then transfer the administrative control of the islands to Japan at the opposition of China. β€” The rest of the disputed is laid according to the 1994 United Nation Convention of Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 200 nautical mile EEZs which didn't come into existence until 47 years after the establishment of dash-lines and International laws generally don't have judicial to things which preceded it. Therefore it shouldn't be applied here in the first place. Once again all the dispute was supported by the American and the American even announced that β€œThe United States has a national interest in freedom of navigation, open access to Asia's maritime commons, and respect for international law in the South China Sea”. The United States has also called for unfettered access to the area that China claims as its own, and accused Beijing of adopting an increasingly aggressive stance on the high seas. The American has also frequently sent warships into the disputed area on so call Freedom of Navigation Operations. Now if we look at historical evidence we can further assure China claims to these islands and the 9 or 11 Dash Line. Diaoyu Islands β€” China claimed the discovery and ownership of the islands from the 14th century and the first Chinese records of these islands date back to as early as the 15th century when they were referred as Diaoyu Dao. While the Japanese maintained ownership of the islands from 1895 until its surrender at the end of World War II which ownership should have been returned to China according to the Cairo Declaration. In the 1945 Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender also contains this statement. Spratly and Paracel Islands β€” The earliest written record of the Spratly Islands can be found in documents dating from the Eastern Han Dynasty 25 AD and The earliest written record of the Paracel islands can be found in historical documents dating from the Song Dynasty 960 AD. The 1887 Chinese-Vietnamese Boundary convention signed between France and China after the Sino-French War states that China was the owner of the Spratly and Paracel islands. The Qing dynasty also sent naval forces on inspection tours in 1902 and 1907 and placed flags and markers on the islands. The Qing dynasty's successor state, the Republic of China, claimed the Spratly and Paracel islands under the jurisdiction of Hainan. The Japanese occupied the Paracels and the Spratlys from February 1939 to August 1945, which was handed back to the Republic of China at the end of WW2 according to the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations. In summary, all evidences support China 9 Dash Line historical and sovereignty claim in the South China Sea. However, it has been continuously undermined with the support of the US in their greed and ambition of controlling the world energy resources, world hegemony and containment of China’s rise. International laws and organizations such as the UN are just becoming tools for the US and are no longer performing the traditional roles that they were created for in the first place. If we use the same standard of argument used against China in the SCS then the international community need to do a lot more American occupation and military bases in Guam, Diego Garcia and other Pacific islands. Additionally information: A special thank to Gerald Tan US State Dept Chief of Spatial Geography and Boundary Analysis, Daniel Dzurek, who works as a professional geographer with distinction on this exact subject; from his book "The Spratly Islands dispute: Who's on First": "Because the Allies, in particular the United Kingdom and the United States, could not agree on which government represented China, no Chinese delegation participated in the 1951 San Francisco Peace Conference. Therefore the Republic of China (Taiwan) negotiated a separate peace treaty with Japan, signed on 28 April 1952. Article 2 of the text included a reference to the San Francisco treaty: β€œIt is recognized that under Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan signed in the city of San Francisco in the United States of American on September 8 1951, Japan has renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) as well as the Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands”. Republic of China has argued that the explicit reference to the Spratly and Paracel islands in the text of this bilateral treaty implies Japanese recognition of Chinese sovereignty. Samuels and Lu have observed that, unlike the 1951 treaty, the Sino-Japanese text mentions the Spratly and Paracel islands in thesame sentence as Taiwan and the Pescadores islands. The latter are generally recognized as Chinese territories. Moreover, according to the negotiating record Japan insisted that the renunciation article deal only with Chinese territory. This shows that the ROC and Japan viewed the islands of Taiwan, the Pescadores, the Spratlys, and the Paracels as having a similar status – that is, belonging to China" US State Dept South China Sea expert Ambassador Chas Freeman who served for decades in the region, regarding China's claim to the SCS: "In 1945, in accordance with the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations and with American help, the armed forces of the Republic of China government at Nanjing accepted the surrender of the Japanese garrisons in Taiwan, including the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Nanjing then declared both archipelagoes to be part of Guangdong Province. In 1946 it established garrisons on both Woody (now Yongxing) Island in the Paracels and Taiping Island in the Spratlys." Viet Nam Bach Long Vi Island history https://thediplomat.com/2019/08/the-south-china-sea-island-china-gave-away/
@johnliew3437 Says:
They flew the "military copter" at the Yellow Sea which is too close to China and expect no response. Really? When China visited Solomon Island and mind you, it was an invitation, they made a big hoo haa.
@sierabravo215 Says:
To watch him Dancing at a Taylor Swift Concert says it all. It was posted on Tik Tok. Well times are ticking and China knows it. He wears an Akubra hat but yet he's a Sydney City boy. He's a weak man and Australia sorry China Knows it.
@nickaalexander-bx6ec Says:
Unprofessional, what utter B'S this is a act off war ! Just the latest of many DELIBERATE AGGRESSIVE ACTION TOWARDS AUSTRALIA AND THE FREE WORLD ! SEND THE THE CHINESE DIPLOMATS HOME , SEVER TIES , YES WE WILL SUFFER ECONOMICLY ! ITS BETTER THAN TAKING UP THE ARSE FROM THESE MUNGRALS ! THE DIGGERS OF THIS NATION WOULD BE TURNING IN THERE GRAVES ! AND POINT BLANK FOR 30 YEARS ABOUT NOW, CONSECUTIVE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT DROP TROUSERS FOR THE CHINESE AND TAKE IT UP THE ARSE, DESPITE BEING WARNED THE WHOLE TIME ! EVERY SINGLE 1 OF THOSE GOVERNMENTS SHOULD BE CHARGED W8TH NEGLIGENCE AND FAILURE TO PROTECT AND GOVERN IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COUNTRY ! AND THE ANDREWS GOVERNMENT OF VICTORIA SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH TREASON ! AND DANIEL HIMSELF BANISHED TO CHINA FOR THE REST OF HIS STINKING NATURAL LIFE ! IMAGINATION FROM CHINA STOPPED ! BAN THEM FROM OUR UNI'S ! REVOKE ALL LEASE AGREEMENTS U BLOODY CLOWNS !
@Fcku733 Says:
Albanese is a spineless pathetic coward!
@johnfirth3752 Says:
There is never anything said about years ago that the China war ship marking out our west and north coast lines in our waters
@jeanmarclentini8888 Says:
Magoo, I like that.
@jeanmarclentini8888 Says:
😊albo is a waste of space.
@Colt3854 Says:
Anal would hide down a rabbit hole if a war started with China.
@imgonnarockyourworld6989 Says:
China strikes again
@KG84C Says:
An bumbling stumbling weak as P clown.
@batmanlives6456 Says:
Hansom boy at his finest!!! Weak as water ….
@johnblack9582 Says:
no way would @rzeholebanese have a go at ding-a-ling xi zing, xi's his boss..
@jeasgordon2802 Says:
Hahah where is SCOMO, hahaha deserves by australlian give thanks to unlimited australlian iron ore supply to China hahah feeding it's military they even surpass the US in the numbered of warships wahahha
@robertseaborne5758 Says:
A weak Albanese kowtowing to China would be a whole lot safer bet than the stupid Albanese we have kowtowing to the US.
@robertseaborne5758 Says:
The sooner the Australian government wakes up to the fact that it has been duped by an overly ambitious US administration into playing silly buggers within koo-ee of Chinese waters and airspace and returns the ADF to protecting Australian waters and airspace, the safer Australians will be.
@user-kr5lb8gc8h Says:
So the Chinese are not only bullies, they are liars as well
@jamielinsdell4900 Says:
So the Murdock press wants us to declare war. This incident is a constant from the bullying tactics of authoritarian China. This is why we are responding correctly through the formation of security pacts such as AUKUS. Only as a bloc of nations can China be challanged. When war is triggered (not if) we will be in a better position than isolated nations. We need the US now more than ever and closer relationships are crucial. Our defense force is laughable against a country whose cities are larger than our entire population. This year alone China is spending over $US700 billion on their military. Troubling indeed. And I doubt a phone call to Xi would ever change anything given they are preparing for war. Despite Philippine protests to the highest levels of government, China still harrasses their movements within their own economic zone with water canons etc. They too have realised the futility of diplomatic engagement and now have opened more bases to the Americans. This is a global problem, not an Albanese one. Proper reporting would distinguish this but not our politically biased friends at Sky. Let's bring in the fumbling sledgehammer called Dutton to solve the problem.
@missnovaxx9992 Says:
Hang on Albo - this is the second time China have attacked our navy! Australia is f**ked if we can't get this gibbering idiot and his band of left-wing lunatics out of power!
@LindsayCharles-zx1fp Says:
You are so on the ball with that pathetic albanese Andrew.
@steveoc1857 Says:
If we had a PM that could get it up, he'd have sent ALL Chinese citizens back to West Taiwan. From the students soaking up our rental market, to the party officials and business leaders who are almost certainly spying on Australia. Too bad we have traitorous left leaning unionists and greens destroying us as the suck up to their communist role models. We will just have to find new business partners
@user-vp6lf3qo3p Says:
Weakest prime minister weve had. He wont retaliate from fear china slap tarrifs on exports that go to china. Boils down to the dollar. Gutless.
@richardtravers8772 Says:
Elbow is so used to being bullied from school days, he doesn't have a clue what to do, other than to cow tow to the Bullies from China.
@user-pi3pl3qe3l Says:
You can’t expect much more from a marxist that adores communist regimes.A true lap dod

More Australia Videos