To be honest China is always use so soft way to deal with that country which they wouldn't care and listening at all.
Just same as China wish keep continue have meeting and talk it over again with EU Union about their Chinese EV Cars import to EU but they don't care much about still agree to go up 38% tax .
Just wish China shouldn't be too soft to deal with the west which they wouldn't listening.
If you are keep continue too soft which they will keep continue against you.
If EU want to go up 38% tax of Chinese EV cars than China must need to return back the same things to them asap.
@myintmaungmaung6471 Says:
What China said is absolutely right.
@louistan7560 Says:
The US has demonstrated very clearly that it does not stand for peace. As such, it should be excluded from all peace negotiations, whether Ukraine, Israel, and any others.
@liar-liar Says:
But the US is controlled by Israel, the US won't listen to China 😂😂😂
@soulbeats135 Says:
Ukraine is culturally fit to have been a perfect bridge country. The Western part being culturally closer to europe and the eastern part culturally closer to russia
@jeffstrehlow2623 Says:
If the West had enforced the Minsk Accords, as they promised they would, there would be peace in Ukraine now, and Ukraine would have retained Donbass. Also, one month or so after the beginning of Russia's Special Military Operation, Russia and Ukraine almost finalized a peace agreement, but the West convinced Ukraine not to proceed with it. If they had proceeded with it, they would now be in a much better situation.
@Pariahindia Says:
UAS is the Devil in the ukraine conflict
@conti-vl6tx Says:
For the past fifteen years, the US has pushed its allies – including those organised in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) – to strengthen their military power.
This military force was then used in a series of provocative actions against those it perceived as threats to its hegemony, with two key countries, China and Russia, facing the sharp edge of the US spear. At the two ends of Eurasia, the US began to provoke Russia through Ukraine and provoke China through Taiwan. The provocations over Ukraine have now resulted in a war that has been ongoing for a year, while the new US bases in the Philippines are part of an escalation against China, using Taiwan as a battleground.
Whether it is Ukraine, Taiwan or Gaza , the US is the worst problem of global stability, but it pretends to be the solution.
The Israel-Hamas war shows that Washington is the single most disruptive force in the world
@conti-vl6tx Says:
China is neither the creator nor a party of the Ukraine crisis, and china has never supplied weapons to any side of the conflicts. The United States is in no position to point fingers at China, let alone shift blames on China. The U.S. side claims it is to prevent wars, but few conflicts and wars that break out in Europe as well as in the globe have nothing to do with the U.S. side.
The U.S. claims it is to maintain peace, but people haven't seen any practical measures taken by the U.S. to promote peace. What they have seen only is that the U.S. has sent weapons into the battlefield endlessly. Just as President Xi Jinping has stressed, the rational voice for peace on the Ukraine issue is getting louder, and most countries support the efforts to ease the tension and promote peaceful talks, and oppose adding fuel to the flame.
The U.S. side should take an objective view of the efforts China and the international community have made to promote peaceful talks, rather than sticking to the Cold War mentality, let alone pushing for prolonging and escalating the conflicts.
@conti-vl6tx Says:
The US is the biggest source of weaponry for the battlefield in Ukraine. the US side announced a further supply of military aid to Ukraine. And whether the US finds it conscionable to tell the world it wants peace and yet sit and watch its defense industry lining up their pocket.
We all saw what the US did in Afghanistan with its strategy of "fighting to the last Afghan". Does it now want Ukraine to "fight till the last Ukrainian?
There are more than enough facts to show the true nature of the US as a source of trouble rather than "defender of peace" for the world.
The 🇺🇸 should seriously reflect on what it has done, stop fanning the flames or profiting from it.
@conti-vl6tx Says:
On the Ukraine issue, China's position has all along been objective and fair. China are committed to promoting talks for peace and working for the political settlement of the crisis. China always stand firm on the side of peace and dialogue.
The US has been pouring lethal weapons into the battlefield in Ukraine, fanning up the flames and spreading disinformation.
The US keeps saying that territorial sovereignty must be respected, but on the Taiwan question, the US has been walking on the edge and pushing the envelope.
The US has broken its own political commitments and been selling sophisticated weapons to China's Taiwan region.
The US says there's desire for peace to prevail, yet it has waged wars and stoked confrontation around the world.
The US says it's important to respect and uphold the international order, yet it has slapped massive unilateral sanctions and put its domestic laws above international law.
The US says competition must be fair, yet it has been cracking down foreign companies by using all kinds of state apparatus and defying international trade rules.
The US needs to reflect on itself, stop sowing confusion, stop trying to misled the world and stop making presumptions about others based on the US's own behaviour.
The US needs to step up to its responsibility, help deescalate tensions and promote dialogue and stop pointing fingers and discrediting other countries.
@conti-vl6tx Says:
China is the only party that brought a peace plan to the table and low and behold Russia agreed with that peace plan but it was the Uk that on the day of discussion decided to sent depleted uranium shells to Ukraine.
Also April 2022 peace was almost there then Uk came in and told Ukraine not to sign the peace deal.
So we should ask ourselves who is for peace and who wants war?
In Mid March 2023, there was a flurry of statements by Russia Ukraine and Turkey which was mediator that the 2 sides had come close to an agreement and they actually exchanged paper. When Jeffrey Sachs spoke with very senior Russian officials about this who described this to him that actually Ukrainian put forward the idea of neutrality and this immediately went to putin and putin said let's draft a peace agreement around this. The Russian did and they put it back to zelensky and then zelensky said no and that's not what he meant.
And the strong rumors which Jeffery Sachs believe are that the United States and UK said to zelensky hell no, you want us to back you we are not backing neutrality and that this was a complete change and it was the end of the negotiations.
So Jeffrey Sachs think that the US has been completely uninterested in the negotiations. That week Biden flew to a NATO meeting in Brussels and declared this is going to be a long war and then he went from Brussels to Warsaw and said that man can't stay in power. And then a few days later Lloyd Austin said our goal is to weaken Russia.
So it's the US policy not to have a negotiated solution.
@DeedeeRooroo Says:
Be careful of this chinese . He might release another virus in the building and act as a victim.
@meimiaolin2581 Says:
This lunatic sociopathic US regime firstly falsely accuses China then impose sanctions based on it.
@ToiChutGongWu Says:
Once the US Military-Industrial Complex can no longer make money from the war the US Reconstruction-Industrial Complex will arrange a ceasefire. There will be a few crumbs of contracts to EU & UK corporations. The West will claim that it has always wanted a ceasefire, but that it was obstructed by Russia.
@bobbytay167 Says:
no war whitehouse paymaster the military industrial complex got no revenue
LATEST COMMENTS