Nuclear power needed for 'high energy demand' industries
Nuclear power needed for 'high energy demand' industries
Advertisement

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

LATEST COMMENTS

@aussie5183 Says:
Notice how global warming has changed to climate change and how suddenly co2 is responsible for cold weather any storm or bad weather and floods. AMAZING
@jamesaustralian9829 Says:
What "high demand industry" would even want to come here with the insane tax, and employee pay costs theyd have to endure.
@KJSvitko Says:
Wind and solar energy combined with battery storage are safer, cleaner and cheaper than fossil fuels or nuclear energy. Fukushima and Chernobyl are still spewing poisons into the environment decades after their disasters. Who will pay to store nuclear waste safely FOREVER.
@ghostofdre Says:
Its good if the objective is to reach net zero but it will increase electricity prices. Also government run? Thats very communist of the LNP.
@nagasako7 Says:
You could power both coasts with few nuclear NPPs.
@pickledturnip-weseeu Says:
Net zero requires no breathing Jasmin.
@trickyboy1517 Says:
"High energy demand" is going to need a nuclear power plant to output more than 18%, Diab. ;)
@oldtimers6460 Says:
Coal is cheaper power than so-called renewables in China. Nuclear is still cheaper than so-called renewables in China. The Net Zero is pure BS.
@Ich_slage_dich_in_dominos Says:
this is talk for kids sure we need nuclear and coal and gas and evrithing else Australia is geting left behind rest of the world like China is living in year 2090 Australia will see what China has in 40 years because it's all about profit and max taxing it's citerzen
@bobthebomb1596 Says:
When governments prevent examination of the figures, ask why.
@omnipresent1215 Says:
We-need-nuclear-power!!!
@johncorlett3699 Says:
Just about the ONLY thing worth voting for Dutton, everything else is the same as Labor, true uniperty
@subbasslines Says:
Net zero 🙄 lay off the crack pipe! You cannot make a omelette without breaking eggs. Net reduction with greater efficiency. Polluting the landscape with solar and wind to tick boxes is not a solution, looks bloody horrible. Products are designed to break and non repairable,
@99bevo Says:
I'm no rocket scientist but I think everyone would already be aware of that ... except for the Labor & Greens party
@HaydenSpence-bx3zv Says:
You lost me when you said "net zero".
@josephgee143 Says:
PURCHASE YOUR ELECTRONIC GOODS FROM CHINA, BEWARE OF ITEMS FROM THE UNITED STATES OF ISRAEL & EUROPE.
@Eric-jo8uh Says:
By the time gets through all the jaw flap, dithering, we just might, just might get nuclear energy by 3050. Send these twats to Finland, they opened a nuclear power station recently, prices went down.
@frankcoates4609 Says:
I represent Global Renewables Security Alliance, and this woman is talking fallacious and flaccid poppycock, and no matter how rigidity staunch Mr Dutton may choose to be, he's a goose. Remember kids, only dopes go nuclear.
@adamsmith-bq8ku Says:
Remember. This person is a lobbyist for the nuclear industry.
@lucasroe2878 Says:
It took them this long to work out what we really needed years ago. Incredible, amazing. What do politicians do again? Apart from giving themselves payrises?
@adamsmith-bq8ku Says:
So what do we do for the next 20 years while we wait for Dutton's nuclear fantasy to materialise. It would be 20 years minimum.
@mikefitzpatrick6618 Says:
If they can't guarantee 2.4 7 power how can they have a cashless economy
@chairmandan1794 Says:
All we need according to Dorothy and Mr Wong is to eat more mung beans.
@rogermckinnon5738 Says:
😂 Labor are full of ...... If Blackout Bowen's brains were petrol. He couldn't power a flea's go-kart around a grain of rice
@kirannnnnn Says:
Ban nuclear
@stenkarasin2091 Says:
What critical modeling shows is generally dependant on who is doing the modeling.
@bluemm2852 Says:
The past 10 years has shown us we cannot rely on other countries for our well being. We need nuclear and we need to produce our own steel, ships and submarines.
@mickrussell-t3t Says:
go back to coal till nuclear is ready to go you idiot Casanova bowen
@imeagleeye1 Says:
Who is paying for the clean up of your Highly lethal Radioactive Toxic forever untreatable waste. Ask the Environmental Protection Agencies
@think_like_a_winner Says:
I happened to do the math on it months ago and from memory it costs $7000 per house i think for nuclear and then its just a usage rate. I think solar is $3500 without a battery and more with. Say 10k with for a battery that does 2000 cycles and last say 15 years. Nuclear last 60 years so in the long run nuclear can be cheaper.
@ianfrost1419 Says:
Get off the grid, Chris Bowen. You are straining our power supply network from stupid ideology.
@philippusgouws7852 Says:
Use the gas you give away for free to American companies
@JUACee Says:
Looks normal..👏👏👏
@__Diagnosis Says:
Every developed country has nuclear power. When Germany closed theirs, the power bills became the most expensive in Europe
@James-to6tg Says:
Ladies and gentlemen, our weak slow government. Children.
@marymcginnis8255 Says:
Nope!

More Australia Videos