No other President has ever needed immunity. But Trump does? Elect a criminal, expect criminal acts.
@maxzzyzxx Says:
Why haven't any other presidents needed immunity? Only criminals need immunity. Like only criminals invoke their 5th amendment rights.
@elchuym4211 Says:
Kaitlan Collins is coming back hard in my good graces. she is taking on these crooked maga attorneys and holding them to account.. right on Kaithlan
@denisecrookshanks3892 Says:
Will Sharf hopefully not voted in, in missouri. uhg
@virginiaipazia6149 Says:
WOW
@vi2623 Says:
That guy has the weirdest smile … 😆🤣😆
@maxnicks4661 Says:
After 60 lawsuits rejected the claim of serious election fraud, there was no legal reason to call for alternate electors! With tRumps history dating back to 2012 of unproven voter fraud you would assume SCOTUS would know this history and not hear such bogus claims.
@ericforrest3511 Says:
Thats why i just love her she is not gonna let clowns 🤡 like this guy
Talk over your her viewers head
You can tell he would do great on
Fox News frfr
@ricardodabreau1660 Says:
This is a bunch of Dooley squat. Trump has taken his playbook of con jobs and phony bankruptcy to the white. His griff will destroy the country and “Make America Weak Again”. A vote for Trump is a vote for dictatorship.
@denisehindes5207 Says:
This guy is an excellent litigator. JFK did send an alternate slate of electors to Hawaii because he believed the results were incorrect.
@jillshowers6852 Says:
Kaitlin Collins is my new journalist super hero. She doesn't use kid gloves and I sure do appreciate it!
@SirJasperKCMG Says:
Well done KC ❤😂🎉
@MorganBelinsky-ug5fu Says:
What a joke - 250 years until this topic ever had to be debated. What a bunch of idiots. Great job Kaitlan for pushing back with reality and facts - you have a gift for doing that in a very professional, non-threatening, way. I always enjoy your interviews!
@aw3752 Says:
The MAGA Supreme Court will totally buy this guy’s argument. It’s already decided when they took the case to start with. It’s over right now. They’ll give Trump (and only Trump in this one case) complete immunity. The rule of law is dead.
@user-wk4ju5ug9i Says:
This dude should be disbarred
@chyl0764 Says:
That’s what slime looks like.
@vondeal1219 Says:
Steven Miller more Racist Brother...
@RubyBandUSA Says:
I dont agree with Kaitlan Collins' political perspectives but she is very sharp and very articulate
@rodneyoneil-kb1xk Says:
YUP,,,ONCE AGAIN,,,,CFROM ,,BOTH. SIDES!!!!
@rodneyoneil-kb1xk Says:
YUP!! ,!
@romaniandracula Says:
I don’t have a shovel big enough to get rid of this garbage.
@ejjunkins9740 Says:
Interesting interview but CNN you continue to disappoint me but letting a convicted sex offender make this argument! I know I know it is 45s attorney yuck.
@billf7062 Says:
Phony baloney Trump lawyer (that appears to have escaped from a Simpson’s cartoon) is full of the ole razzle dazzle.
@christinaannabel Says:
Bogus. Trump's attorneys are desperately trying to complicate the matter to keep their client out of jail, and they would destroy our democratic institutions to ensure their party remains in power. Millions of citizens believe Trump's behavior was seditious, treasonous, illegal, undemocratic and an abuse of the Constitution. It's time for Trump to be held accountable in courts and for our democratic institutions to be protected in courts of law, including the Supreme Court. We the People elect the president, and no person or party may undermine or change the outcome of a U.S. election.
Hilary Clinton was correct. Trump, his allies the MAGA base, and the attorneys that represent them are deplorable. They are the antithesis of patriotic.
@executetrumpfortreason1400 Says:
He smiles like a evil clown.
@bernsbandana Says:
This attorney can yap like an attorney… but anyone with an ounce of common sense, can read through his dumb bullshit.
@paoher7458 Says:
well you might just lost your bid for AG with this interview
@craig5908 Says:
Wow this guy is the definition of bad faith
@robseale17 Says:
That insta smile. The same every time.
@user-zt3in5om3t Says:
Its alot of bullsh.t from the right and 45 id in the middle lk e of it as usual hes b trying to get awaya b d get away with his fkd up criminal behavior no other xpres has had theses problems or cause this much destruction or chaos
@stevenh9207 Says:
Beavis didnt age well.
@deftlefthand9964 Says:
Yes, the law is malleable. That said, this guy is trying to force a bunch of criminal acts into a bizarre and twisted shape and expects us to accept it as something resembling a legitimate defense. Gross.
@philrow9652 Says:
Drep
@lawandacontreras767 Says:
The one simple question, if 45 is so innocent as he claims, why in the hell does he need immunity? 🤔
@lawandacontreras767 Says:
Never in my life have I heard more bull💩 excuses for such a corrupt POs 45 and his co-conspiracy thug in office and out! 🤬🤬 this is pure corruption!
@Kimberly11168 Says:
This woman will be living a lonely life ahead. You will see
@crayonwriter Says:
We made it through 250 years without immunity lol ... Now we need a special Trump law? 🤣 So embarrassing to be an American these days.
@user-me4xm6hm5k Says:
Is this guy for real
@gfystarshine Says:
Guy must think we're all complete idiots, wtf.
@kennethdavis1964 Says:
These people are the threat.
@kwewitch7338 Says:
yes we are laffing :)
@wildfiveswildridethedirttr532 Says:
The ball is the details!
@ronblack215 Says:
Joe obumer is criminal in chief and the so called democrats are organized crime
@ronblack215 Says:
CNN communist news network
@andrewnichol5387 Says:
She was Great ! Finally, a reporter that didn't let them get away with anything he was saying. Excellent!
@andrewnichol5387 Says:
This guy was so full of $hit, that I almost puked on my floor. GTFO ! What a load of crap
@marianturenne3567 Says:
DOES HE “REALLY BELIEVE” WHAT HE’S SAYING OR DOES HE HAVE TO SAY IT BECAUSE HE’S BEING “PAID”
@Swindog00 Says:
And if the structural checks are in place why then the need to define personal and official and have immunity in the first place? Wouldn't the character check be enough as an example. Trump fails on that point immediately. The character side of the argument hasn't been explored. In 230 years there has been no need for it based on the exemplar types of people 'the people' themselves vote in.
@Swindog00 Says:
Hes chasing a word salad and losing. His argument makes no sense. They asked in the SC that going forward it would be helpful have defined official and non official defined. Of course you would then carry on and continue charging the non official acts. I mean there's bound to be 11, 000 odd of them.
LATEST COMMENTS