Grim details and unanswered questions: The Bayesian superyacht sinking investigated
Grim details and unanswered questions: The Bayesian superyacht sinking investigated
Advertisement

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

LATEST COMMENTS

@rolandvencel4256 Says:
Has similarties to Kobe x Helicopter x Thick Fog...
@pedroferreira4695 Says:
Demonic event
@tm75_88 Says:
I'm italian .... it's just shameless the amount of lies set up to try to hide this mass murderer. The sea? .... yes, a sea force 007 👈
@Ross-b8r Says:
Pointless old content’ pffffttt
@newforestpixie5297 Says:
“ boats are watertight “
@newforestpixie5297 Says:
“ the esteemed Chairman of Morgan Stanley International “ sounds like a really big wig. In English reports I haven’t heard him mentioned until now.
@KingstoneS318 Says:
I still believe the bigger your investment the bigger your risks
@wernerostwald287 Says:
Go away you idiots. Let time tell the truth...not your garbage reporting.
@pauljandersen1759 Says:
HUMANS DESERVE AT VERY LEAST DIGNITY AS TO FACTS AS WELL ☑️🙏🏻
@pauljandersen1759 Says:
BE PROFESSIONAL AS A PROFESSIONAL JOURNALIST 🗝☑️
@pauljandersen1759 Says:
NOT 60 SECONDS ‼️‼️‼️‼️
@pauljandersen1759 Says:
NOT 80 METERS
@Alex000113 Says:
Perhaps the freak localized weather exposed Bayesians design flaws, leading to disaster. An oversized mast made it easier to knock the boat over. As the mast approaches the water, because the limit of positive stability was so low, it would continue to roll over rather than right itself (Most sailboats have twice the righting capability). Having vents on the side of the boat and a cockpit that easily allows water to enter the interior means it will flood and sink quickly (and maybe defeat the function of the watertight bulkhead doors). Hope there are some lessons learned for future designs.
@juliagregory5696 Says:
that yacht at 6.36 is NOT the Bayesian look at the spreaders on the mast
@TaVestru Says:
globally 22,000 children die each day due to poverty alone. No one mentions anything. But just because an ugly fat rich guy died, we stand in awe. What did Mike give you to worry so much about him?! He's gone, get on with life. Dirty money brings dirty actions!
@apropos4701 Says:
What do you call a group of Perini Navi superyachts? A "risk" of yachts.
@rray3630 Says:
Typical Shitaly Bullshit .......blame the crew......NOT the builder......at least the foreign crew tried to save people.....they didn't fuck off like a captain from Italy like STETTINO
@rray3630 Says:
The engine room door was NOT open . NOT OPEN
@jorgeborrell81 Says:
The keel was up because it was compulsory to have it up at anchor. Keel down at ankor was more risky. Both yachts drag at the same time in same direction. If there is other guilty instead the nature forzes its the designer and shipyard, no doubt.
@nicoladelglyn8835 Says:
Absolute BS!!! Super Yacht News or eSysman Super Yachts if you want the truth, information from previous captains, engineers, crew, designers - always worth learning from those who actually know their stuff! Not forgetting the Military have issued their weather information & intell showing that the conjecture onhere is wrong
@Whiskermarks Says:
Batten down the hatches is supposed to be the captain’s famous last words..
@mariacarmelitapiroli3873 Says:
L'inglese tecnico nn lo conosco Traducete per favore In ogni caso, lo yacht era perfettamente funzionante, dunque chi doveva farlo non ha saputo, non è stato in grado di gestire la situazione 😢 Le prove sono le fonti dell' esperienza del giudice dal codice di procedura penale!
@GrumpyOldMan9 Says:
The other day a immigrant boat flipped drowning 600 in the same Med. We're waiting for the Sky special "Tragedy off the coast of Lampedusa"
@SashaCoCo Says:
No one should isolate the multiple deaths caused by the fast sinking of the Bayesian yacht off the coast of Sicily from the suspicious death that occurred a few hours before of Steve Chamberlain after Steve was hit by a car while he was jogging in London. Steve Chamberlain and Mike Lynch won their freedom from the US government just a few weeks before in late-June 2024 after a US jury ruled in their favor in a multi-billion dollar white-collar criminal case involving Hewlett Packard and the US government. They had been facing prison due to allegations of financial fraud and criminal charges stemming from the multi-billion dollar deal from selling Autonomy to Hewlett Packard. Hewlett-Packard cried foul and alleged that Autonomy had been overvalued. The US then extradited Mike Lynch from Great Britain in handcuffs and chains and kept him under house arrest with cameras in every room during the litigation in the US which lasted over 10 years. After his release, Mike Lynch was in discussion about developing assistive devices or software incorporating AI to help the hearing impaired. Mike Lynch, their attorney, and his witness in the litigation were celebrating Mike Lynch's freedom and litigation win with their spouses, employees, and family members. Mike Lynch had said he'd been given a new life and wanted to reflect on the direction of his life. The trip on the Bayesian yacht was meant as a celebration. His daughter was admitted into Oxford and he had won his freedom. His attorney and legal team, his witness and friend, his employee and family members were onboard the Bayesian yacht for a celebratory vacation. However, the new found freedom of Steve Chamberlain and Mike Lynch wouldn't be enjoyed for long. Within a matter of hours of each other, Steve Chamberlain would be dead in London and Mike Lynch, their attorney, and a witness in their litigation would all be dead off the coast of Sicily due to the fast sinking of the Bayesian yacht. Their deaths occurred in London and off the coast of Sicily within a few hours of each other. It feels like foul play and revenge. Too many people ended up dead within hours of each other even though they were in London and in the Mediterranean Sea and all were connected to the decade-long litigation involving the US government and Hewlett Packard.
@youtubeAIDigitalContentCreator Says:
They are a bunch or rich weak ninnies who never had a hard days work in their life. Just like them having under ground bunkers for when a nuke hits because of the trouble in the world they cause, no guarantee your bunker will actually protect you, in fact the odds are you will even be anywhere near the bunker to hop into it if and when a bomb detonates. Sometimes you need more then brains to protect you, it helps to have physical strength.
@liryan5312 Says:
The same Media, the same performance, Different Puppet.
@spickspan5718 Says:
The lounge was covered by a canvas roof..if there was a down burst, it could have ripped it to shreds, allowing the water to enter.
@apropos4701 Says:
There's no doubt at all that it was a poorly designed vessel. Instead of having the superstructure as a series of rising nests, all the surfaces stepped down. At the center was the lowest surface, where a defective glass door pair would allow water to fall through stairwells into the lower levels in huge volumes that would make escaping through the stairways impossible. Water could come over the gunwales even while simply sailing, and this doesn't take into account the lower vents for the air conditioning. It sat so low in the water compared to her sisters, that the shell door could never be left down but only used promptly and on a flat sea. The extended keel knocked so loudly that it wasn't feasible to leave it down during sleeping hours. The keel ballast was barely enough to counter the sail and wasn't enough to right the vessel if it went beyond a very modest righting angle. Water ingress starts as early as 35 degrees and would pour in unimpeded at 60 degrees. The longer the vessel stays over at 60 degrees or beyond, the less liking it is that the vessel will be able to overcome the increasing weight of incoming water. Many sailing vessels will right themselves even at 100 degrees and some at 150 degrees, but the Bayesian would not be able to pop up again past about 70 or 75 degrees, and this is without reckoning with the flooding. Why would the vessel even need to worry about being knocked down below 75 degrees? The single aluminum (not carbon fiber) mast and (with the boom) its huge profile. To make a dick that tall for the owner, the builders made many, many changes that added to its unique luxuriousness and bragging rights, but also stripped the vessel of all its extra margins for stability and safety. Add to the structural issues too few knowledgeable crew, no lifesaving drill or even demonstration, and you have put your life in the hands of Luck. Winds and waves don't believe in Luck. About 10 or 12 minutes was all it took (heeled over) to sink the vessel. All this mundane information will come out soon. It doesn't make a satisfying story to modern hearers, does it? But the ancient Greeks would have loved this story of hubris. Good sailing to ye.
@anthonyxuereb792 Says:
True, it was a safe boat having been built in 2008, that's 16 years of sailing. Incidents involving anglo saxons will always attract more public interest naturally.
@jonathanarmasmcglinn1747 Says:
The Baysian WAS very unusual: she had 6 passengers HP shareholders had a contract on, who were in the same place at one time... so they were all killed. Now we just need to know who, and how. We all know why.
@shakennotstirred3607 Says:
Billionaire Autonomy cofounder Mike Lynch's and Stephen Chamberlain's careers were intertwined for years in a fraud trial. Then they died on the same day miles apart. Stephen Chamberlain, who was fatally struck by a car in the U.K. this month.Aug 27, 2024
@mgphoto84 Says:
Anytime someone says a vessel is unsinkable, it will doom that vessel. Not from superstition, but from arrogance and ignorance from mariners and manufacturers. A licensed, professional mariner would never say that. It's a very amateur and immature thing to say by those who did about this incident. Also, the manufacturing owner automatically blamed the crew without any other details except for the vessel sank. That was almost the first day after the incident. That right there tells you everything you need to know about the manufacturer in this incident.
@yvonnelessick9880 Says:
😢😢😢sorry to be nasty and beasty perhaps would have been better if yacht had been built-in Gdansk Poland. The ship building dockyard also for yachts. Absolutely. No offence to Italian ship building. Or even Italy. Itself. Eastern Bloc country's could have better thing and TECHNOLOGY
@yvonnelessick9880 Says:
My late husband worked in South African Merchant Navy he told me once that one NEVER drops anchor in the Middle of sea he was 😮😮 emphatic about. Must be good reason why he was emphatically about that here the Bayesian did just the opposite. What was the outcome ??? Plus this story of the keel
@susettemclachlan8765 Says:
Just ask yourself: who wanted the owner dead? That’s the ONLY relevant question in this case. All other discussion is a distraction!!!
@IPMI_pascal_fanti Says:
Why neither of the two boat indicated strong winds?
@IPMI_pascal_fanti Says:
It's been lightening for over 3 hours before the accident and all weather forecast available were giving a warning. Despite this, the captain did not prepare the boat, the crew and the passengers. He abandonned the ship and did not try to save anybody.
@IPMI_pascal_fanti Says:
Not really. The sinking lastet 16 minutes. Once full of water, it took one minute to sink.
@patciava3398 Says:
I believe that the coincidences and circumstances uncovered by the ongoing investigations and autopsies are more than strange. They not only reveal a series of highly unlikely mistakes by the captain and crew but also contain baffling details. The crew said they were putting away the cushions when the storm hit and they fell in the water. Sailors who don't know basic safety rules (like tie themselves down with a rough sea) are not sailors. Does it seem plausible to you that during a storm, the crew would put away cushions instead of ensuring the passengers' safety? The yacht drifted for 16 minutes, as shown by the AIS track, without control. What was the captain doing? Why didn't he turn on the engines like the captain of the other boat nearby? There was plenty of time to warn the guests and bring them on deck. The yacht was equipped with a very powerful audible siren; it would have been enough to sound it to alert all the guests and bring them onto the deck. That's basic seamanship to not have your keel up and your doors open when a storm hits. And it was known long before that the weather was about to change. 40 km/h means 20 knots, that is absolutely manageable for a sailing vessel and laughable for a vessel like Bayesian, especially without huge waves. All the victims (except Lynch’s daughter) were found in the same cabin, which was different from the one they were originally assigned. The autopsies revealed that they died of suffocation, and no water was found in their lungs. How can this be explained? Imagine passengers gathering in a single cabin below deck while the boat is filling with water and sinking, instead of trying to escape. Unlikely. Why did they suffocate and not drown? Even if they had run out of oxygen in an air pocket, they would have eventually swallowed water. But, of course, you have to be alive to inhale water. Only if they were already dead would they have avoided ingesting water. Everyone involved in the multibillion trial has died—including Chamberlain, who was hit by a car in England the day before—while the entire crew survived. How can you defend a captain who abandons his ship without ensuring the safety of his passengers? In this specific case, there is little debate about responsibility: a captain who abandons the passengers to save himself and his crew is unquestionably committing a grave crime, regardless of external circumstances. This reflection points to a series of unexplained anomalies and raises serious questions about the events surrounding the incident. The choices and outcomes seem too improbable to be attributed to mere accident, leading to suspicions of foul play or deeper, hidden causes.
@HappyYummmy Says:
gme relstion
@eugyero958 Says:
Stop with the bs of global warming then global cooling then hey lets just call ot climate change.
@BTCxyz369 Says:
This all boils down to... "INCOMPETENCY" Choose your Captain and crew wisely folks, as some mums do have them !
@offroadoffshore153 Says:
That guy is clueless in the assessment department. It is vessel with a low righting moment and a low down flooding angle. To suggest it involves crew negligence is totally unwarranted.
@aliasif8498 Says:
Just the common sense suggests serious design failure as it sank within 20mins.... Even if the captain or crew made some huge mistake such an expensive yatch shouldn't have sunk so quickly
@Fighterforjustice-l6y Says:
Besides Captain and Chief Engineer. All rest of crew very inexperienced and understaffed. The yacht crew are not professional seamen. They are more like amateurs seamen. Definitely with more professional crew this tragedy could have been avoided.
@susettemclachlan8765 Says:
To go down in 60 seconds is unnatural was the Hull sabotaged? Why are there no clear explanations coming forth ? It is totally suspicious and certainly not due to a bad weather event
@stevemathews9535 Says:
Water spouts and sudden downpours do not sink ships if they are secured for sea - Bayesian obviously was not. What action was taken by the crew when the vessel was dragging her anchor. It was said in the video that she dragged it a long way. Gathering the crew and passengers in life jackets on deck in a storm is not a good idea and unnecessary if the vessel is closed down. The keel should have been lowered, main propulsion started and the vessel driven towards the anchor that could be recovered or slipped and the Bayesian put to sea. I cannot accept that bad weather warning had not been monitored on board.
@AmericaFirstFLL Says:
I had $30 million and was surrounded by criminals. I had no idea. Most were lawyers. My life became The American Horror Story. My 5 children were victimized in the violent crimes. Two billionaires who were celebrating a multi billion dollar victory are now dead. There is a multi billion dollar motive.
@kwatl777 Says:
They built a vessel that could handle 99.9999% of weather. But, they were hit with the 0.0001% event. It is possible that it was a well-designed yacht with a proper crew but they were hit with something powerful and unexpected. In other words, it may have been simply an extreme event.
@concernedcitizen2076 Says:
What is this Dr. specialized in? "No boats are unsinkable" - well we have come pretty far since the days of Titanic, and we also have state of the art weather reports, big mistakes must have been made by the crew.

More Australia Videos